IHC Profiler: An Open Source Plugin for the Quantitative Evaluation and Automated Scoring of Immunohistochemistry Images of Human Tissue Samples

In anatomic pathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) serves as a diagnostic and prognostic method for identification of disease markers in tissue samples that directly influences classification and grading the disease, influencing patient management. However, till today over most of the world, pathological analysis of tissue samples remained a time-consuming and subjective procedure, wherein the intensity of antibody staining is manually judged and thus scoring decision is directly influenced by visual bias. This instigated us to design a simple method of automated digital IHC image analysis algorithm for an unbiased, quantitative assessment of antibody staining intensity in tissue sections. As a first step, we adopted the spectral deconvolution method of DAB/hematoxylin color spectra by using optimized optical density vectors of the color deconvolution plugin for proper separation of the DAB color spectra. Then the DAB stained image is displayed in a new window wherein it undergoes pixel-by-pixel analysis, and displays the full profile along with its scoring decision. Based on the mathematical formula conceptualized, the algorithm is thoroughly tested by analyzing scores assigned to thousands (n = 1703) of DAB stained IHC images including sample images taken from human protein atlas web resource. The IHC Profiler plugin developed is compatible with the open resource digital image analysis software, ImageJ, which creates a pixel-by-pixel analysis profile of a digital IHC image and further assigns a score in a four tier system. A comparison study between manual pathological analysis and IHC Profiler resolved in a match of 88.6% (P<0.0001, CI = 95%). This new tool developed for clinical histopathological sample analysis can be adopted globally for scoring most protein targets where the marker protein expression is of cytoplasmic and/or nuclear type. We foresee that this method will minimize the problem of inter-observer variations across labs and further help in worldwide patient stratification potentially benefitting various multinational clinical trial initiatives.

[1]  William M Gallagher,et al.  Novel image analysis approach for quantifying expression of nuclear proteins assessed by immunohistochemistry: application to measurement of oestrogen and progesterone receptor levels in breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[2]  E B Cox,et al.  Use of a monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody in the immunohistochemical evaluation of human tumors. , 1986, Cancer research.

[3]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Observer variability in the interpretation of HER2/neu immunohistochemical expression with unaided and computer-aided digital microscopy. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  A. De,et al.  Quantitative Immunohistochemical Analysis Reveals Association between Sodium Iodide Symporter and Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  T Vrekoussis,et al.  Image analysis of breast cancer immunohistochemistry-stained sections using ImageJ: an RGB-based model. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[6]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[7]  Bernd Jähne,et al.  Practical handbook on image processing for scientific applications , 1997 .

[8]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Comparison of Quantification of Histochemical Staining By Hue-Saturation-Intensity (HSI) Transformation and Color-Deconvolution , 2003, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[10]  E. Lundberg,et al.  A global view of protein expression in human cells, tissues, and organs , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[11]  T. Stephenson,et al.  HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[12]  S. Hsu,et al.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. , 1981, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[13]  S Lozanoff,et al.  A full color system for quantitative assessment of histochemical and immunohistochemical staining patterns. , 1999, Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission.

[14]  Helen Boyle,et al.  Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interpretation of immunohistochemical stains of prostate cancer , 2009, Virchows Archiv.

[15]  E. Lundberg,et al.  A tool to facilitate clinical biomarker studies - a tissue dictionary based on the Human Protein Atlas , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[16]  Joerg Schwock,et al.  Quantitative image analysis of immunohistochemical stains using a CMYK color model , 2007, Diagnostic pathology.

[17]  G. Rangan,et al.  Quantification of renal pathology by image analysis (Methods in Renal Research) , 2007, Nephrology.

[18]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Automated quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor expression in breast carcinoma does not differ from expert pathologist scoring: a tissue microarray study of 3,484 cases , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[19]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[20]  Mikael Lundin,et al.  Development and evaluation of a virtual microscopy application for automated assessment of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer , 2011, BMC clinical pathology.

[21]  Lynne Dobson,et al.  Image analysis as an adjunct to manual HER-2 immunohistochemical review: a diagnostic tool to standardize interpretation , 2010, Histopathology.

[22]  Larry V McIntire,et al.  Automated Selection of DAB-labeled Tissue for Immunohistochemical Quantification , 2003, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[23]  Keerthana Prasad,et al.  Automation of immunohistochemical evaluation in breast cancer using image analysis. , 2011, World journal of clinical oncology.

[24]  K A Matkowskyj,et al.  Quantitative Immunohistochemistry by Measuring Cumulative Signal Strength Using Commercially Available Software Photoshop and Matlab , 2000, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[25]  M. Becich,et al.  Immunohistochemical staining of radixin and moesin in prostatic adenocarcinoma , 2011, BMC clinical pathology.

[26]  D. Rimm,et al.  Quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in breast cancer , 2007, Laboratory Investigation.

[27]  Jinsong Liu,et al.  Assessment of Two Automated Imaging Systems in Evaluating Estrogen Receptor Status in Breast Carcinoma , 2007, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[28]  Vilppu J Tuominen,et al.  ImmunoRatio: a publicly available web application for quantitative image analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67 , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[29]  Kingshuk Roy Choudhury,et al.  A Robust Automated Measure of Average Antibody Staining in Immunohistochemistry Images , 2010, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[30]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  G. Rangan,et al.  Quantification of renal pathology by image analysis. , 2007, Nephrology.