The role of trees in urban stormwater management.

Urban impervious surfaces convert precipitation to stormwater runoff, which causes water quality and quantity problems. While traditional stormwater management has relied on gray infrastructure such as piped conveyances to collect and convey stormwater to wastewater treatment facilities or into surface waters, cities are exploring green infrastructure to manage stormwater at its source. Decentralized green infrastructure leverages the capabilities of soil and vegetation to infiltrate, redistribute, and otherwise store stormwater volume, with the potential to realize ancillary environmental, social, and economic benefits. To date, green infrastructure science and practice have largely focused on infiltration-based technologies that include rain gardens, bioswales, and permeable pavements. However, a narrow focus on infiltration overlooks other losses from the hydrologic cycle, and we propose that arboriculture - the cultivation of trees and other woody plants - deserves additional consideration as a stormwater control measure. Trees interact with the urban hydrologic cycle by intercepting incoming precipitation, removing water from the soil via transpiration, enhancing infiltration, and bolstering the performance of other green infrastructure technologies. However, many of these interactions are inadequately understood, particularly at spatial and temporal scales relevant to stormwater management. As such, the reliable use of trees for stormwater control depends on improved understanding of how and to what extent trees interact with stormwater, and the context-specific consideration of optimal arboricultural practices and institutional frameworks to maximize the stormwater benefits trees can provide.

[1]  J. Dwyer,et al.  Understanding the Benefits and Costs of Urban Forest Ecosystems , 2007 .

[2]  Stephanie Pincetl,et al.  Implementing Municipal Tree Planting: Los Angeles Million-Tree Initiative , 2009, Environmental management.

[3]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  German experience in managing stormwater with green infrastructure , 2014 .

[4]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project , 1995, Urban Ecosystems.

[5]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Towards understanding governance for sustainable urban water management. , 2011 .

[6]  Tenley M. Conway,et al.  Community groups and urban forestry activity: Drivers of uneven canopy cover? , 2011 .

[7]  Peter Steen Mikkelsen,et al.  SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage , 2015 .

[8]  D. Dillman,et al.  How Urban Residents Rate and Rank the Benefits and Problems Associated with Trees in Cities , 2004, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[9]  C. Grimmond,et al.  Intraurban Differences of Surface Energy Fluxes in a Central European City , 2006 .

[10]  Joseph P. McFadden,et al.  Seasonal contributions of vegetation types to suburban evapotranspiration , 2011 .

[11]  J. E. Wagner,et al.  Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[12]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States , 2013 .

[13]  S. Ustin,et al.  Rainfall Interception by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[14]  M. Taniguchi,et al.  Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge. 2: A cylindrical infiltration model for evaluating the stemflow contribution to groundwater recharge , 1996 .

[15]  R. Kjelgren,et al.  Urban tree transpiration over turf and asphalt surfaces , 1998 .

[16]  Lee K. Rhea,et al.  How Much Is Enough? Minimal Responses of Water Quality and Stream Biota to Partial Retrofit Stormwater Management in a Suburban Neighborhood , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Coupling whole-tree transpiration and canopy photosynthesis in coniferous and broad-leaved tree species , 2002 .

[18]  Ow,et al.  Green Infrastructure Design and Implementation , 2015 .

[19]  Manfred Köhler,et al.  Green roofs in temperate climates and in the hot‐humid tropics – far beyond the aesthetics , 2002 .

[20]  M. Hopton,et al.  Comparing street tree assemblages and associated stormwater benefits among communities in metropolitan Cincinnati, Ohio, USA , 2014 .

[21]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA , 2010 .

[22]  Jun Wang,et al.  Mechanistic Simulation of Tree Effects in an Urban Water Balance Model 1 , 2008 .

[23]  Ralph A. Sanders,et al.  URBAN VEGETATION IMPACTS ON THE HYDROLOGY OF DAYTON, OHIO , 1986 .

[24]  N. Grimm,et al.  Global Change and the Ecology of Cities , 2008, Science.

[25]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover , 1996 .

[26]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK , 2013 .

[27]  D. Gallet The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits , 2011 .

[28]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Winter rainfall interception by two mature open‐grown trees in Davis, California , 2000 .

[29]  D. Herrmann,et al.  National Assessment of Tree City USA Participation According to Geography and Socioeconomic Characteristics , 2016 .

[30]  E. Perfect,et al.  Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils , 1994 .

[31]  W. Daniels,et al.  Below ground matters: Urban soil rehabilitation increases tree canopy and speeds establishment , 2016 .

[32]  Qingfu Xiao,et al.  Rainfall interception by Santa Monica's municipal urban forest , 2002, Urban Ecosystems.

[33]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services , 2008 .

[34]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Rainfall interception of three trees in Oakland, California , 2011, Urban Ecosystems.

[35]  William D. Shuster,et al.  Prospects for enhanced groundwater recharge via infltration of urban storm water runoff: A case study , 2007 .

[36]  I. Pulford,et al.  Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees--a review. , 2003, Environment international.

[37]  B. Wadzuk,et al.  Understanding the Role of Evapotranspiration in Bioretention: Mesocosm Study , 2015 .

[38]  P. May,et al.  The Potential Role of Urban Forests in Removing Nutrients from Stormwater. , 2016, Journal of environmental quality.

[39]  G. D. Jenerette,et al.  Plant water-use efficiency as a metric of urban ecosystem services , 2011 .

[40]  M. Zeppel,et al.  Daily, seasonal and annual patterns of transpiration from a stand of remnant vegetation dominated by a coniferous Callitris species and a broad-leaved Eucalyptus species , 2006 .

[41]  James R. Simpson,et al.  Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal , 2011 .

[42]  S. Subburayalu,et al.  Assessing street tree diversity in four Ohio communities using the weighted Simpson index , 2012 .

[43]  Richard J. Hauer,et al.  Factors influencing long-term street tree survival in Milwaukee, WI, USA , 2013 .

[44]  Tim D Fletcher,et al.  Impediments and Solutions to Sustainable, Watershed-Scale Urban Stormwater Management: Lessons from Australia and the United States , 2008, Environmental management.

[45]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception within a single beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) canopy: influence of foliation, rain event characteristics, and meteorology , 2008 .

[46]  Transpiration and Root Development of Urban Trees in Structural Soil Stormwater Reservoirs , 2009, Environmental management.

[47]  K. Gallo,et al.  Surface Energy Balance Measurements Above an Exurban Residential Neighbourhood of Kansas City, Missouri , 2009 .

[48]  J. Tanimoto,et al.  Field experiment on transpiration from isolated urban plants , 2007 .

[49]  Weiping Chen,et al.  Water, heat, and airborne pollutants effects on transpiration of urban trees. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[50]  J. V. Van Stan,et al.  Forest Canopy Interception Loss Across Temporal Scales: Implications for Urban Greening Initiatives , 2015 .

[51]  T. Endreny,et al.  Implications of bioretention basin spatial arrangements on stormwater recharge and groundwater mounding. , 2009 .

[52]  J. Byrne,et al.  A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones , 2012 .

[53]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Barriers and bridges to the integration of social-ecological resilience and law , 2014 .

[54]  T. Conway,et al.  Variations in municipal urban forestry policies: A case study of Toronto, Canada , 2007 .

[55]  Helen A. Cleugh,et al.  The impact of suburban design on water use and microclimate , 2005 .

[56]  Qingfu Xiao,et al.  Surface Water Storage Capacity of Twenty Tree Species in Davis, California. , 2016, Journal of environmental quality.

[57]  T. Givnish Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves : solving the triple paradox , 2002 .

[58]  S. Livesley,et al.  Rainfall interception and stem flow by eucalypt street trees – The impacts of canopy density and bark type , 2014 .

[59]  T. Lucke,et al.  A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments , 2015 .

[60]  Yang Hong,et al.  Actual evapotranspiration estimation for different land use and land cover in urban regions using Landsat 5 data , 2010 .

[61]  J. Clapp,et al.  Rationale for the increased use of conifers as functional green infrastructure: A literature review and synthesis , 2014 .

[62]  F. Ludwig,et al.  Below‐ground competition between trees and grasses may overwhelm the facilitative effects of hydraulic lift , 2004 .

[63]  Xinmin Zhang,et al.  The most economical irrigation amount and evapotranspiration of the turfgrasses in Beijing City, China , 2007 .

[64]  M. Weiler,et al.  A New Approach in Measuring Rainfall Interception by Urban Trees in Coastal British Columbia , 2009 .

[65]  Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses,et al.  Rainfall Interception Loss by Forest Canopies , 2011 .

[66]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Transpiration from a multi-species deciduous forest as estimated by xylem sap flow techniques , 2001 .

[67]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Evapotranspiration rates in urban areas , 1999 .

[68]  M. Kanda,et al.  Seasonal and Diurnal Fluxes of Radiation, Heat, Water Vapor, and Carbon Dioxide over a Suburban Area , 2004 .

[69]  Justin Morgenroth,et al.  Tree Species Suitability to Bioswales and Impact on the Urban Water Budget. , 2016, Journal of environmental quality.

[70]  Michiaki Sugita,et al.  Seasonal variation of surface fluxes and scalar roughness of suburban land covers , 2005 .

[71]  W. Shuster,et al.  Front-loading Urban Stormwater Management for Success – A Perspective Incorporating Current Studies on the Implementation of Retrofit Low-impact Development , 2008 .

[72]  N. Jovanovic,et al.  Critical review of methods for the estimation of actual evapotranspiration in hydrological models , 2012 .

[73]  Julia Bartens,et al.  Can urban tree roots improve infiltration through compacted subsoils for stormwater management? , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[74]  Stephanie Pincetl,et al.  Transpiration of urban forests in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[75]  E. Nikinmaa,et al.  The role of the residential urban forest in regulating throughfall: A case study in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA , 2013 .

[76]  F. Montalto,et al.  Accounting for Uncertainty in Determining Green Infrastructure Cost-Effectiveness , 2011 .