Weather or Not? Welfare Impacts of Natural Gas Pipeline Expansion in the Northeastern U.S.

New production of natural gas in the Marcellus region of Pennsylvania has created tremendous opportunities to increase natural gas use in the U. S. Unfortunately, the benefits from this new production are limited by the scarcity of pipeline capacity out of the region. Several new pipelines have been proposed to address this issue. Here we focus on the potential economic effects of one of these projects, the proposal by the Williams Company to expand its Transcontinental Gas (“Transco”) pipeline through the Atlantic Sunrise project in the northeastern United States. The Atlantic Sunrise project would permit additional deliveries from the Marcellus region to markets on the main Transco system. It would also afford more flexibility to the Transco system, by creating the ability to accommodate flow reversals in response to market conditions. To understand the market impact of the Atlantic Sunrise expansion, we develop a model, based on the arbitrage cost approach in Kleit (2001), that is well suited for fine-grained spatial evaluation of the market effects of relieving gas transmission constraints, employing daily data from 2012 to the middle of 2014. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to address the question of the economic effects of a natural gas pipeline expansion. Over the 30-month period examined in our study we estimate that consumers served by Transco from Alabama to New Jersey would have enjoyed about $2.6 billion in total benefits because of the Atlantic Sunrise expansion. There are two specific aspects of our findings, however, we wish to emphasize. First, the benefits to consumers are not uniform over time and will vary greatly with system conditions. More than 60 percent of the benefits in our period of study would have accrued in January 2014 alone, because of the high level of gas demand associated with the “polar vortex” in that month. Second, the benefits to consumers are not uniform over geographic areas. Because of the location of the constraints on the Transco system, we estimate that Virginia-North Carolina-South Carolina customers would benefit nearly three times as much as Alabama-Georgia customers. Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland customers exhibit the highest benefits overall, but would have also been harmed during certain periods when exports from this region to Virginia cause prices north of Virginia to increase. These price increases, however, are far smaller than the price decreases that would occur due to Atlantic Sunrise during severe winter periods.

[1]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  The influence of the Panama Canal on global gas trade , 2014 .

[2]  Peter R. Hartley,et al.  The Baker Institute World Gas Trade Model , 2005 .

[3]  David Fletcher,et al.  Modelling skewed data with many zeros: A simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression , 2005, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[4]  Did Open Access Integrate Natural Gas Markets? An Arbitrage Cost Approach , 1998 .

[5]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  A large-scale linear complementarity model of the North American natural gas market , 2005 .

[6]  A. Kleit,et al.  The effectiveness of FERC’s transmission policy: is transmission used efficiently and when is it scarce? , 2008 .

[7]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  Cartelization in gas markets: Studying the potential for a “Gas OPEC” , 2012 .

[8]  Larry E. Ruff Rethinking Gas Markets--and Capacity , 2012 .

[9]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Future evolution of the liberalised European gas market: Simulation results with a dynamic model , 2008 .

[10]  Gijsbert Zwart European Natural Gas Markets: Resource Constraints and Market Power , 2008 .

[11]  Nicola Secomandi,et al.  On the Pricing of Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[12]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  A strategic model of European gas supply (GASMOD) , 2008 .

[13]  A Rolling Optimisation Model of the UK Natural Gas Market , 2014 .

[14]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Trading in the Downstream European Gas Market: A Successive Oligopoly Approach , 2004 .

[15]  Susan W. Palocsay,et al.  An optimization model for planning natural gas purchases, transportation, storage and deliverability , 1996 .

[16]  Knut Einar Rosendahl,et al.  The Global Natural Gas Market: Will Transport Cost Reductions Lead to Lower Prices? , 2009 .

[17]  THE LAW OF ONE PRICE IN A NETWORK: ARBITRAGE AND PRICE DYNAMICS IN NATURAL GAS CITY GATE MARKETS* , 1996 .

[18]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  A Mixed Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Model of Natural Gas Markets , 2005, Oper. Res..

[19]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros , 1996 .

[20]  Hillard G. Huntington,et al.  Industrial natural gas consumption in the United States: An empirical model for evaluating future trends , 2007 .

[21]  Franziska Holz,et al.  The World Gas Model: A Multi-Period Mixed Complementarity Model for the Global Natural Gas Market , 2009 .

[22]  Gunnar Stefánsson,et al.  Analysis of groundfish survey abundance data: combining the GLM and delta approaches , 1996 .

[23]  H. Weigt,et al.  Removing Cross-Border Capacity Bottlenecks in the European Natural Gas Market—A Proposed Merchant-Regulatory Mechanism , 2015 .

[24]  John C. Butler,et al.  Optimizing Natural Gas Flows with Linear Programming and Scenarios , 1999 .

[25]  F. Joutz Estimating Regional Short-Run and Long-Run Price Elasticities of Residential Natural Gas Demand in the U.S. , 2009 .

[26]  Valuing Electricity Transmission: The Case of Alberta , 2012 .

[27]  Ryan P. Kellogg,et al.  Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas , 2015 .

[28]  Vipin Arora Estimates of the Price Elasticities of Natural Gas Supply and Demand in the United States , 2014 .

[29]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  A Complementarity Model for the European Natural Gas Market , 2007 .

[30]  A. Neumann,et al.  Elasticities of Supply for the US Natural Gas Market , 2014 .

[31]  Nicola Secomandi,et al.  A Computational Approach to the Real Option Management of Network Contracts for Natural Gas Pipeline Transport Capacity , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[32]  Svetlana Ikonnikova,et al.  Factors influencing shale gas production forecasting: Empirical studies of Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville, and Marcellus Shale plays , 2015 .

[33]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  The World Gas Model , 2010 .