Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies

[1]  P. Mohnen.  International R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth , 2001 .

[2]  Israel Zang,et al.  Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity , 2000 .

[3]  Bruce D. Phelps.  Money Chasing Deals? The Impact of Fund Inflows on Private Equity Valuations , 2000 .

[4]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[5]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .

[6]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence , 2007 .

[7]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuation , 2000 .

[8]  D. Usher.  The Coase theorem is tautological, incoherent or wrong , 1998 .

[9]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America , 1998 .

[10]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes , 1998 .

[11]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labor Markets , 1998 .

[12]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .

[13]  J. Angrist,et al.  Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics , 1998 .

[14]  Chris F. Walters.  Agglomeration Economies, Technology Spillovers and Company Productivity Growth , 1998 .

[15]  P. Geroski,et al.  Agglomeration Economies, Technology Spillovers and Company Productivity Growth , 1998 .

[16]  Jarle Møen,et al.  From Growth Theory to Technology Policy - Coordination Problems in Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[17]  Alberto Abadie,et al.  Instrumental Variables Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects , 1998 .

[18]  J. Lerner.  The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the Sbir Program , 1998 .

[19]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[20]  T. Klette,et al.  Accumulation of R&D Capital and Dynamic Firm Performance: a Not-so-Fixed Effect Model , 1998 .

[21]  J. Neary.  Pitfalls in the theory of international trade policy: concertina reforms of tariffs and subsidies to high technology industries , 1998 .

[22]  J. Heckman,et al.  Making the Most out of Programme Evaluations and Social Experiments: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Programme Impacts , 1997 .

[23]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[24]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy , 1997 .

[25]  Paul A. David,et al.  FROM MARKET MAGIC TO CALYPSO SCIENCE POLICY A Review of Terence Kealey's The Economic Laws of Scientific Research , 1997 .

[26]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  The Economics of New Goods , 1997 .

[27]  Rachel Schmidt,et al.  The Advanced Technology Program: A Case Study in Federal Technology Policy , 1997 .

[28]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Economic analysis of research spillovers implications for the advanced technology program , 1996 .

[29]  T. Klette.  R&D, Scope Economies, and Plant Performance , 1996 .

[30]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Private and Social Returns to Research and Development , 1996 .

[31]  David J. Teece,et al.  Estimating the benefits from collaboration: The case of SEMATECH , 1996 .

[32]  Lee G. Branstetter.  Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[33]  T. Wilkie.  The Economic Laws of Scientific Research , 1996 .

[34]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development , 1996 .

[35]  K. Kauko.  Effectiveness of R & D subsidies — a sceptical note on the empirical literature , 1996 .

[36]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[37]  Ian Tonks,et al.  Handbook of The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change , 1996 .

[38]  T. Randall Curlee,et al.  Evaluating technology innovation programs: the use of comparison groups to identify impacts , 1995 .

[39]  D. Leahy,et al.  Public Policy Towards R&D in Oligopolistic Industries , 1995 .

[40]  K. Matsuyama.  Economic Development as Coordination Problems , 1995 .

[41]  K. Matsuyama.  Complementarities and Cumulative Processes in Models of Monopolistic Competition , 1995 .

[42]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  High Tech R&D Subsidies: Estimating the Effects of Sematech , 1994 .

[43]  J. Eaton,et al.  International Patenting and Technology Diffusion , 1994 .

[44]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[45]  Z. Griliches.  National Science Foundation Grants for Economics: Response , 1994 .

[46]  D. Laband.  National Science Foundation Grants for Economics: Correspondence , 1994 .

[47]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Innovations and Technological Spillovers , 1993 .

[48]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  The Profitability of Innovating Firms , 1993 .

[49]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[50]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[51]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Innovation and the Sectoral Sources of UK Productivity Growth , 1991 .

[52]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[53]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[54]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  The Welfare Analysis of Product Innovations, with an Application to Computed Tomography Scanners , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[55]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[56]  J. Bernstein.  Costs of Production, Intra- and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence , 1988 .

[57]  R. Levin.  Appropriability, R&D Spending, and Technological Performance , 1988 .

[58]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[59]  Paul Krugman,et al.  The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher : Notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies , 1987 .

[60]  Leonard Solomon Silk,et al.  Communicating Economic Ideas and Controversies , 1986 .

[61]  T. Bresnahan.  Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance: Mainframe Computers inFinancial Services , 1986 .

[62]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[63]  B. Øksendal.  Stochastic Differential Equations , 1985 .

[64]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s , 1985 .

[65]  M. Spence.  Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance , 1984 .

[66]  Shmuel Nitzan,et al.  Optimum Contracts for Research Personnel, Research Employment, and the Establishment of "Rival" Enterprises , 1982, Journal of Labor Economics.

[67]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[68]  W. Greene.  Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment , 1981 .

[69]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[70]  R. Horwitz.  The planning of observational studies of human populations , 1979 .

[71]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[72]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations , 1977 .

[73]  J. Heckman.  Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System , 1977 .

[74]  Z. Griliches.  Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[75]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1890 .