Digital Commons and Citizen Coproduction in Smart Cities: Assessment of Brazilian Municipal E-Government Platforms

Good governance practices through electronic government (eGov) platforms can be suitable instruments for strengthening the outcomes of smart city policies. While eGov is the application of information and communication technologies to public services, good governance defines how well public authorities manage public and social resources. Contemporary public management views, such as ‘new public service’, include citizen participation as a critical factor to sustainable government in smart cities. Public services, in the age of digital technology, need to not only be delivered through eGov platforms, but also need to be coproduced with the engagement of social players, e.g., citizens. In this sense, eGov platforms act as digital commons, and conceived as digital spaces, where citizens and public agents interact and collaborate. In this paper, we presented the Municipal eGov Platform Assessment Model (MEPA), which is a model specifically developed to evaluate eGov platforms regarding their potential to promote commons in smart cities. The study applied MEPA to 903 municipal websites across Brazil. The results revealed that the majority of investigated Brazilian eGov platforms have only a low level of digital commons maturity. This finding discloses less citizenship coproduction, and fewer opportunities for city smartness. As the MEPA model offers public authorities an instrument to depict weaknesses and strengths of municipal eGov platforms, its adoption provides an opportunity for authorities to plan and manage their platforms to act as promoters of digital commons and citizen coproduction.

[1]  Laura Alonso-Muñoz,et al.  Transparency and political monitoring in the digital environment. Towards a typology of citizen-driven platforms , 2017 .

[2]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The Growth of the Commons Paradigm , 2007 .

[3]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[4]  Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam,et al.  E-government portals: A knowledge management study , 2012, Electron. Libr..

[5]  José Antonio Gomes de Pinho Investigando portais de governo eletrônico de estados no Brasil: muita tecnologia, pouca democracia , 2008 .

[6]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[7]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  E-Government Portals in Mexico , 2006 .

[8]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[9]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Citizen Participation and Policing: What Do We Know? , 1978 .

[10]  Renata Machova,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Open Data Portals on the National Level , 2017, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[11]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  A Knowledge Management Strategy for the Jason Organization*: A Case Study , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Dalton Francisco de Andrade,et al.  Measuring web usability using item response theory: Principles, features and opportunities , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[13]  Aylin Ilhan,et al.  Informational Urbanism. A Conceptual Framework of Smart Cities , 2017, HICSS.

[14]  Kostas S. Metaxiotis,et al.  Building Prosperous Knowledge Cities: Policies, Plans and Metrics , 2012 .

[15]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services , 2014, AI & SOCIETY.

[16]  Irene Pollach,et al.  Environmental websites: an empirical investigation of functionality and accessibility , 2006 .

[17]  L. Buys,et al.  Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework , 2018, Cities.

[18]  Svetlana Stepchenkova,et al.  Benchmarking CVB website performance: Spatial and structural patterns , 2010 .

[19]  Rogério Cid Bastos,et al.  Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature , 2017 .

[20]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[21]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[22]  Nabaz Nawzad Abdullah,et al.  Access to Government Information in Public Policy Making Process: A Case Study of Kurdistan , 2015 .

[23]  Frederika Welle Donker,et al.  How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? , 2017, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[24]  D. West E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[25]  Abdoullah Fath-Allah and Laila Cheikhi and Rafa E. Al-Qutais Idri,et al.  e-Government maturity models: a comparative study , 2014 .

[26]  Wilson Gomes,et al.  A democracia digital e o problema da participação civil na decisão política , 2005 .

[27]  Tan Yigitcanlar Position paper: Benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  許俊湧 The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering , 2004 .

[29]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  eGovernment in cities of the knowledge society. An empirical investigation of Smart Cities' governmental websites , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Feng Ding,et al.  E-government for the People: Learn from North America and European Union , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[31]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[32]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Hernán Astudillo,et al.  Conception, development and implementation of an e-Government maturity model in public agencies , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Information Systems Theory , 2012, Integrated Series in Information Systems.

[35]  E. Ostrom,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons : a chapter from Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: from Theory to Practice. , 2005 .

[36]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Assessing capability for justice information sharing , 2007, DG.O.

[37]  Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa The accessibility of Saudi Arabia government Web sites: an exploratory study , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[38]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..