Predator Percolation, Insect Outbreaks, and Phase Polyphenism

Apart from being notorious outbreak pests, locusts are of interest because of their expression of density-dependent "phase polyphenism." In this remarkable form of phenotypic plasticity, changes in local population density generate distinct solitarious and gregarious phases that differ in behavior, physiology, and appearance. A hallmark of phase polyphenism in outbreak species is the transition from solitary living to group formation and subsequent mass movement in migratory bands or swarms, yet there has been no convincing general explanation for the evolution of these density-dependent switches in spatial distribution. Using a model from "percolation theory", we show that it would be highly detrimental for locust individuals to continue indefinitely in a dispersed spatial distribution as their population densities increase. Switching to an extremely clumped distribution is advantageous because it disrupts the connectivity of predators' food-patch networks. Thus, selection pressure from predators has probably been an important factor underlying the initial evolution of conditional switches between "dispersed" and strongly aggregative behavior, which will also affect outbreak dynamics. Although group formation is the best alternative for high-density populations, it brings its own set of severe problems, resulting in secondary selection for many of the traits seen in gregarious-phase individuals.

[1]  I. Couzin,et al.  Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Simpson,et al.  Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S. J. Simpson,et al.  Density–dependent aposematism in the desert locust , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  G. Turner,et al.  Attack Abatement: A Model for Group Protection by Combined Avoidance and Dilution , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Locust Phase Polyphenism: An Update , 2009 .

[6]  G. Sword.  Density-dependent warning coloration , 1999, Nature.

[7]  S. Gillett,et al.  Locust as prey: Factors affecting their vulnerability to predation , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  D. Greathea..  A brief survey of the effects of biotic factors on populations of the desert locust. , 1966 .

[9]  E. Despland,et al.  Landscape structure and locust swarming: a satellite's eye view , 2004 .

[10]  M. Boots,et al.  Group living and investment in immune defence: an interspecific analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Matthew Collett,et al.  Small‐scale processes in desert locust swarm formation: how vegetation patterns influence gregarization , 2000 .

[12]  S. J. Simpson,et al.  Surviving the change to warning colouration: density-dependent polyphenism suggests a route for the evolution of aposematism , 2005, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[13]  J. Gouyet.  Physics and Fractal Structures , 1996 .

[14]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Joining and avoidance behavior in nonsocial insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[15]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Small‐scale vegetation patterns in the parental environment influence the phase state of hatchlings of the desert locust , 2000 .

[16]  E. Despland,et al.  Food choices of solitarious and gregarious locusts reflect cryptic and aposematic antipredator strategies , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  H. Leirs,et al.  The abundance threshold for plague as a critical percolation phenomenon , 2008, Nature.

[18]  David K. Weaver,et al.  Grasshoppers and locusts , 2007 .

[19]  Mohamed Abdallahi Ould Babah,et al.  Linking Locust Gregarization to Local Resource Distribution Patterns Across a Large Spatial Scale , 2004 .

[20]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[21]  K. Wilson.  Evolutionary ecology of insect host-parasite interactions: an ecological immunology perspective. , 2005 .

[22]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  John L. Capinera,et al.  Encyclopedia of entomology , 2004 .

[24]  G. Varley,et al.  Grasshoppers and Locusts , 1967 .

[25]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  D C Krakauer,et al.  Spatial scales of desert locust gregarization. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Kenneth Falconer,et al.  Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications , 1990 .

[28]  J. Rolff,et al.  Insect Evolutionary Ecology , 2005 .

[29]  R. Cheke.  Theoretical rates of increase of gregarious and solitarious populations of the Desert Locust , 2004, Oecologia.

[30]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[31]  Gregory A. Sword,et al.  Local population density and the activation of movement in migratory band-forming Mormon crickets , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The dilemma of the selfish herd: the search for a realistic movement rule. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands , 2008, Current Biology.

[34]  M. Watve,et al.  Epidemic diseases and host clustering: an optimum cluster size ensures maximum survival. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.