Comparison of different methods for determination of drip loss and their relationships to meat quality and carcass characteristics in pigs.

Samples of the M. longissimus dorsi of 776 pigs from three commercial lines were used to compare two methods for measuring drip loss, referred to as the EZ-DripLoss and bag methods. Furthermore, relationships between drip loss and other meat quality and carcass traits were analysed. The bag method used a slice of M. longissimus dorsi of approximately 120 g hung in an airtight container whereas the EZ-DripLoss method used two samples of approximately 10 g placed in drip loss containers. In the bag method, samples taken at 24 h post-mortem were measured 24 and 48 h after sampling and average drip loss was 1.94% and 3.33% at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Correlation between these consecutive measurements was high (r=0.98). Using the EZ-DripLoss method, drip loss of samples taken at 24 h post-mortem was measured 48 h after sampling and showed an average value of 4.97%. Correlation between the drip loss obtained using EZ-DripLoss and bag methods was high (r=0.86). Relationships between drip loss and other meat quality traits were similar for both methods. Highest correlations were observed between drip loss and pH(45) (r=-0.52 and -0.48 using EZ-DripLoss method(48) and bag method(48), respectively) and the lowest to Minolta a (∗) value (r=0.11 and 0.09, respectively). Correlations among several carcass traits, such as lean content, and drip loss were low or not significant. Low associations between loin eye area (cm(2)) and drip loss were obtained regardless of the method used to determine drip loss (r=0.21 and 0.18 using EZ-DripLoss method(48) and bag method(48), respectively). For routine measurements, the EZ-DripLoss method is recommended because it showed a high correlation with the bag method but is easier to perform and is more standardised.

[1]  K. M. Irvin,et al.  Rendement Napole gene effects and a comparison of glycolytic potential and DNA genotyping for classification of Rendement Napole status in Hampshire-sired pigs. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[2]  R. G. Kauffman,et al.  The use of filter paper to estimate drip loss of porcine musculature. , 1986, Meat science.

[3]  R. G. Kauffman,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COLOR AND WATER‐HOLDING CAPACITY IN POSTRIGOR PORCINE LONGISSIMUS MUSCLE , 1995 .

[4]  R. Bates,et al.  Pork quality variation is not explained by glycolytic enzyme capacity. , 2003, Meat science.

[5]  R. G. Kauffman,et al.  Use of electrical conductivity to predict water-holding capacity in post-rigor pork. , 2000, Meat Science.

[6]  H. Graser,et al.  Genetic parameters for lean meat yield, meat quality, reproduction and feed efficiency traits for Australian pigs , 2000 .

[7]  L. B. Christensen.  Drip loss sampling in porcine m. longissimus dorsi. , 2003, Meat science.

[8]  S. Smet,et al.  Effect of time of deboning and sample size on drip loss of pork , 1999 .

[9]  G. Eikelenboom,et al.  Genetic parameters of pork quality and production traits in Yorkshire populations , 1994 .

[10]  M. V. Van Oeckel,et al.  Comparison of different methods for measuring water holding capacity and juiciness of pork versus on-line screening methods. , 1999, Meat science.

[11]  M F Rothschild,et al.  Correlations among selected pork quality traits. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[12]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Effect of processing plant on pork quality. , 2003, Meat science.

[13]  K. Honikel,et al.  Measurement of water-holding capacity and juiciness , 1994 .

[14]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Genetic parameters for lean meat content and meat quality traits in different pig breeds , 1997 .

[15]  K. Lundström,et al.  Variation in light scattering and water-holding capacity along the porcine Longissimus dorsi muscle. , 1985, Meat science.

[16]  H. J. Andersen,et al.  Physiological and structural events post mortem of importance for drip loss in pork. , 2002, Meat science.

[17]  R. Hamm,et al.  Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Wasserbindung im Muskel , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  T. Baas,et al.  Variation of Muscle Quality Parameters within the Longissimus Muscle , 1997 .

[19]  T. R. Dutson,et al.  Advances in meat research , 1985 .

[20]  R. Hovenier,et al.  Genetic parameters of pig meat quality traits in a halothane negative population , 1992 .

[21]  S. Hermesch,et al.  Genetic parameters for lean meat yield, meat quality, reproduction and feed efficiency traits for Australian pigs 2. Genetic relationships between production, carcase and meat quality traits , 2000 .

[22]  K. Honikel,et al.  Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. , 1998, Meat science.