Output order in immediate serial recall

In two experiments, we examined the effect of output order in immediate serial recall (ISR). In Experiment 1, three groups of participants saw lists of eight words and wrote down the words in the rows corresponding to their serial positions in an eight-row response grid. One group was precued to respond in forward order, a second group was precued to respond in any order, and a third group was postcued for response order. There were significant effects of output order, but not of cue type. Relative to the forward output order, the free output order led to enhanced recency and diminished primacy, with superior performance for words output early in recall. These results were replicated in Experiment 2 using six-item lists, which further suggests that output order plays an important role in the primacy effect in ISR and that the recency items are most highly accessible at recall.

[1]  C. Philip Beaman,et al.  The separate but related origins of the recency effect and the modality effect in free recall , 2000, Cognition.

[2]  G D Brown,et al.  Oscillator-based memory for serial order. , 2000, Psychological review.

[3]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  James S Nairne,et al.  The mnemonic effects of recall on immediate retention , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[5]  G. Ward,et al.  The effect of the length of to-be-remembered lists and intervening lists on free recall: a reexamination using overt rehearsal. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000) , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Vousden,et al.  Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: data and a model. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[8]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[9]  S. Lewandowsky.  Redintegration and Response Suppression in Serial Recall: A Dynamic Network Model , 1999 .

[10]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Rate of Presentation in Running Memory and Direct Manipulation of Input-Processing Strategies , 1973 .

[11]  Alan Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of Verbal Stm by Irrelevant Speech, Articulatory Suppression, and Manual Tapping: Do they have a Common Source? , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  B B Murdock,et al.  Distractor and probe techniques in short-term memory. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  M. Kahana,et al.  Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[14]  G. Ward,et al.  A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[17]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The Disruption of STM: A Response to Our Commentators , 2003 .

[18]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Understanding serial position curves in short-term recognition and recall. , 2003 .

[19]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[20]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[22]  L. Wood.  Cuing of Recall Order in Immediate Memory with Different Rates of Presentation. , 1971 .

[23]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: separating input and output factors. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  B. Murdock,et al.  The effects of visual presentation method on single-trial free recall , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[25]  C. Philip Beaman,et al.  Inverting the modality effect in serial recall , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  Behavioral strategies in immediate memory , 1969 .

[27]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[28]  D. Norman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW PRIMARY MEMORY1 , 1965 .

[29]  B. Murdock.  Short-term memory and paired-associate learning , 1963 .

[30]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[31]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Deconfounding Serial Recall , 2002 .

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  RATE OF PRESENTATION AND ORDER OF RECALL IN IMMEDIATE MEMORY. , 1964, British journal of psychology.

[33]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[34]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  R. Henson.  Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[37]  J Richard Hanley,et al.  Irrelevant speech , articulatory suppression , and phonological similarity : A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model , 2003 .