Bionomina , a forum for the discussion of nomenclatural and terminological issues in biology

Science is an encounter between reality and language. It is based on objects and facts, apprehended through observation and experimentation, and on descriptive, predictive and explanatory concepts, models and theories, expressed through language. Accurate, unambiguous and universal communication is crucial for science to operate and develop. As well stated by clear-sighted scientists and historians of science like Ernst Mayr, an important, although often underrated, ground of disagreement, or of false agreement, among scientists, is the terminology they use. Not rarely, different colleagues or schools of thought erroneously think they disagree (or agree), simply because they use different terms for the same concept, or the same term for different concepts. Therefore scientific terms, i.e., simple words, play a crucial role in the scientific activity. This is particularly true of biology, particularly of the fields that deal with the comparative and

[1]  B. Russell THE CULT OF ‘COMMON USAGE’* , 1953, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  A GRAMMAR OF CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH1 , 2006 .

[3]  A. Love Idealization in evolutionary developmental investigation: a tension between phenotypic plasticity and normal stages , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Carl von Linné Species plantarum : exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas , 2011 .

[5]  E. G. Voss International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 1983 , 1983 .

[6]  R. Bleier Science and Gender , 2020, Solar Impact: Climate and the Sun.

[7]  A. Moczek On the origins of novelty in development and evolution. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[8]  Alain Dubois,et al.  New proposals for naming lower-ranked taxa within the frame of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. , 2006, Comptes rendus biologies.

[9]  Zhi-Qiang Zhang,et al.  Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy , 2007 .

[10]  Alain Dubois,et al.  Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature . 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature , 2005 .

[11]  W. Stearn International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants. , 1953 .

[12]  T. Hoquet La sociobiologie est-elle amendable ?: Biologistes, féministes, darwiniennes face au paradigme de la sélection sexuelle , 2009 .

[13]  Augustin Pyramus de Candolle,et al.  Théorie élémentaire de la botanique, ou exposition des principes de la classification naturelle et de l'art de décrire et d'étudier les végétaux , 1813 .

[14]  Dieter Wolff,et al.  A chronological English dictionary , 1970 .

[15]  Alain Dubois,et al.  Synonymies and related lists in zoology : general proposals, with examples in herpetology , 2000 .

[16]  Steffen Schulze-Kremer,et al.  The Ontology of the Gene Ontology , 2003, AMIA.

[17]  Lars Vogt,et al.  The future role of bio-ontologies for developing a general data standard in biology: chance and challenge for zoo-morphology , 2009, Zoomorphology.

[18]  Carl von Linné Systema Naturae: Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, , 2011 .

[19]  Lars Vogt,et al.  The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data , 2009, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[20]  Sp Lapage,et al.  International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria: Bacteriological Code, 1990 Revision , 1992 .