Endovascular Treatment of Cerebrovascular Lesions Using Nickel- or Nitinol-Containing Devices in Patients with Nickel Allergies.

Nickel is used in many cerebral endovascular treatment devices. However, nickel hypersensitivity is the most common metal allergy, and the relative risk of treatment in these patients is unknown. This retrospective analysis identified patients with nickel or metal allergies who underwent cerebral endovascular treatment with nickel-containing devices. Seven patients with nickel and/or other metal allergies underwent treatment with 9 nickel-containing devices. None experienced periprocedural complications. No patient received treatment with corticosteroids or antihistamines. At a mean clinical follow-up for all patients of 22.8 months (range, 10.5-38.0 months), no patients had symptoms attributable to nickel allergic reactions. The mean radiographic follow-up for all patients at 18.4 months (range, 2.5-37.5 months) showed successful treatment of the targeted vascular pathologies, with no evidence of in-stent stenosis or other allergic or hypersensitivity sequelae. The treatment of cerebrovascular lesions with a nickel-containing device resulted in no adverse outcomes among these patients and was safe and effective.

[1]  M. Levitt,et al.  Response to: Correspondence on “Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents” by Apostolos et al , 2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[2]  C. Tsioufis,et al.  Correspondence on “Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents” by Vanent et al , 2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[3]  G. Barros,et al.  Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents , 2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[4]  A. Davies,et al.  Nickel hypersensitivity and endovascular devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Heart.

[5]  K. Sumita,et al.  Refractory in-stent stenosis after flow diverter stenting associated with delayed cobalt allergic reaction , 2021, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[6]  E. Vivas,et al.  Efficacy and safety of the dual-layer flow-diverting stent (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[7]  J. D. Delgado Almandoz,et al.  Pipeline Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Cutaneous Metal Allergy. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[8]  A. Ozpinar,et al.  Use of Pipeline Endovascular Device in Patients with Nickel Allergies. , 2018, World Neurosurgery.

[9]  Patrick K. Nicholson,et al.  Nickel-Related Adverse Reactions in the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Literature Review. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[10]  D. Spoerl,et al.  Hypersensitivity to an intracerebral stent and symptomatic cerebral lesions: A possible link? , 2017, The Journal of dermatology.

[11]  I. Nakagawa,et al.  Republished: Nickel-associated delayed multiple white matter lesions after stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial unruptured aneurysm , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[12]  Dong Joon Kim,et al.  Delayed enhancing lesions after coil embolization of aneurysms: clinical experience and benchtop analyses , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[13]  Qinghai Huang,et al.  Endovascular Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: To Use Stent(s) or Not? Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[14]  N. Sourour,et al.  Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions secondary to endovascular aneurysm therapy: nickel allergy or foreign body reaction? Case series and review of the literature , 2016, Neuroradiology.

[15]  C. Başar,et al.  Relation of Nickel Allergy with in-Stent Restenosis in Patients Treated with Cobalt Chromium Stents , 2012, Annals of dermatology.

[16]  N. Kocer,et al.  Reversible intracranial parenchymal changes in MRI after MCA aneurysm treatment with stent-assisted coiling technique; possible nickel allergy , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[17]  M. Alexander,et al.  Nickel allergy: a reason for concern? , 2010, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[18]  Torkil Menné,et al.  Metal allergy--a review on exposures, penetration, genetics, prevalence, and clinical implications. , 2010, Chemical research in toxicology.

[19]  Allan Linneberg,et al.  The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  G. Nakazawa,et al.  The impact of metallic allergy on stent implantation: metal allergy and recurrence of in-stent restenosis. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  T. Norgaz,et al.  Is there a link between nickel allergy and coronary stent restenosis? , 2005, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.