Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.

[1]  L. Claxton,et al.  Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? , 2005, Mutation research.

[2]  P. Steinbok.  Ethical considerations relating to writing a medical scientific paper for publication , 1995, Child's Nervous System.

[3]  Donald Kennedy,et al.  Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems , 2003, Science.

[4]  T. Kaptchuk,et al.  Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence. , 2003, BMJ.

[5]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[7]  M. Callaham.  Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  L. Bero,et al.  How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  J. Huff,et al.  IARC Monographs, Industry lnfluence, and upgrading, Downgrading, and Under-grading Chemicals: A Personal Point of View , 2002 .

[10]  A. Mainous,et al.  The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship. , 2002, Family medicine.

[11]  Roger D Kempers,et al.  Ethical issues in biomedical publications. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  Kathy Barker.  At The Helm: A Laboratory Navigator , 2002 .

[13]  Emily A. Ronning,et al.  Conference Summary: Conflict of Interest and Its Significance in Science and Medicine , 2002 .

[14]  Beth Schachter.  Partners in research, competitors in pay , 2002 .

[15]  N Dixon,et al.  Writing for publication--a guide for new authors. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[16]  G. Eysenbach.  Medical students see that academic misconduct is common , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Steven M. Bachrach.  The Journals Crisis: Redirecting the Blame , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  D. Lang.  The art of scientific writing. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  A. Shamoo,et al.  Ethics in research. , 2000, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[20]  K. Gorelick.  Industry affiliations and scientific conclusions. , 1998, JAMA.

[21]  L. Bero,et al.  Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies. , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  A. Overbeke,et al.  What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). , 1998, JAMA.

[23]  D. Rennie.  Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: setting the balance right. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[24]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications. , 1998, JAMA.

[25]  D. Greenblatt,et al.  Conflicts of interest, redundant publication, and identification of authorship: a plea for trust instead of suspicion. , 1998, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[26]  Clare Dyer.  Tobacco company set up network of sympathetic scientists , 1998, BMJ.

[27]  Richard Horton,et al.  The unmasked carnival of science , 1998, The Lancet.

[28]  S. Sereika,et al.  Multiple authorship: issues and recommendations. , 1997, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[29]  H. Hillman.  Parafraud in biology , 1997, Science and engineering ethics.

[30]  M. Gilson,et al.  Responsibility of Co-Authors , 1997, Science.

[31]  L. Altman.  The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 2 , 1996, The Lancet.

[32]  Maria E. Protti.  Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. , 1996, Journal of information ethics.

[33]  Seymour J Garte.  Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research , 1995, Science and engineering ethics.

[34]  D. Rennie,et al.  Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. , 1994, JAMA.

[35]  R. Kempers.  Writing and interpreting medical literature. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[36]  R J Lilford,et al.  Multiple author trend worst in medicine. , 1993, BMJ.

[37]  R. Epstein,et al.  Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? , 1993, BMJ.

[38]  Carbone Pp.  On authorship and acknowledgements. , 1992 .

[39]  Christopher Anderson.  Writer's cramp , 1992, Nature.

[40]  M F Fathalla,et al.  On authorship and acknowledgements. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  W. B. Fye.  Medical authorship: traditions, trends, and tribulations. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[42]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. , 1976 .

[43]  F. Ingelfinger.  Medical literature: the campus without tumult. , 1970, Science.