A baseline solution for CFD Point 1 (Mach 24) in the STS-107 accident investigation was modified to include effects of: (1) holes through the leading edge into a vented cavity; and (2) a scarfed, conical nozzle directed toward the centerline of the vehicle from the forward, inboard corner of the landing gear door. The simulations were generated relatively quickly and early in the investigation because simplifications were made to the leading edge cavity geometry and an existing utility to merge scarfed nozzle grid domains with structured baseline external domains was implemented. These simplifications in the breach simulations enabled: (1) a very quick grid generation procedure; and (2) high fidelity corroboration of jet physics with internal surface impingements ensuing from a breach through the leading edge, fully coupled to the external shock layer flow at flight conditions. These simulations provided early evidence that the flow through a two-inch diameter (or larger) breach enters the cavity with significant retention of external flow directionality. A normal jet directed into the cavity was not an appropriate model for these conditions at CFD Point 1 (Mach 24). The breach diameters were of the same order or larger than the local, external boundary-layer thickness. High impingement heating and pressures on the downstream lip of the breach were computed. It is likely that hole shape would evolve as a slot cut in the direction of the external streamlines. In the case of the six-inch diameter breach the boundary layer is fully ingested. The intent of externally directed jet simulations in the second scenario was to approximately model aerodynamic effects of a relatively large internal wing pressure, fueled by combusting aluminum, which deforms the corner of the landing gear door and directs a jet across the windside surface. These jet interactions, in and of themselves, were not sufficiently large to explain observed aerodynamic behavior.
[1]
P. Roe.
Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes
,
1997
.
[2]
Cheatwood F. McNeil,et al.
User''s Manual for the Langley Aerothermodynamic Upwind Relaxation Algorithm (LAURA)
,
1996
.
[3]
William Kleb,et al.
Characteristics of the Shuttle Orbiter leeside flow during a reentrycondition
,
1992
.
[4]
Peter A. Gnoffo,et al.
A multiblock analysis for shuttle orbiter re-entry heating from Mach24 to Mach 12
,
1993
.
[5]
Peter A. Gnoffo,et al.
Conservation equations and physical models for hypersonic air flows in thermal and chemical nonequilibrium
,
1989
.
[6]
Peter A. Gnoffo,et al.
Navier-Stokes simulations of Orbiter aerodynamic characteristics including pitch trim and bodyflap
,
1994
.
[7]
H. C. Yee,et al.
On symmetric and upwind TVD schemes
,
1985
.