A New Method of Adaptive Zoning for Spatial Interaction Models

Spatial interaction models commonly use discrete zones to represent locations. The computational requirements of the models normally arise with the square of the number of zones or worse. For computationally intensive models, such as land usetransport interaction models and activity-based models for city regions, this dependency of zone size is a long-standing problem that has not disappeared even with increasing computation speed in PCsit still forces modelers to compromise on the spatial resolution and extent of model coverage as well as on the rigor and depth of model-based analysis. This article introduces a new type of discrete zone system, with the objective of reducing the time for estimating and applying spatial interaction models while maintaining their accuracy. The premise of the new system is that the appropriate size of destination zones depends on the distance to their origin zone: at short distances, spatial accuracy is important and destination zones must be small; at longer distances, knowing the precise location becomes less important and zones can be larger. The new method defines a specific zone map for every origin zone; each origin zone becomes the focus of its own map, surrounded by small zones nearby and large zones farther away. We present the theoretical formulation of the new method and test it with a model of commuting in England. The results of the new method are equivalent to those of the conventional model, despite reducing the number of zone pairs by 96% and the computation time by 70%.

[1]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Destination sampling in forecasting: application in the prism model for the UK West Midlands Region , 2007 .

[2]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Modeling Spatial Autocorrelation in Spatial Interaction Data: An Application to Patent Citation Data in the European Union , 2008 .

[3]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[4]  Ian Richard Gordon Entropy, Variety, Economics, and Spatial Interaction. 熵、多样性、经济学和空间相互作用 , 2010 .

[5]  P. Waddell A Behavioral Simulation Model for Metropolitan Policy Analysis and Planning: Residential Location and Housing Market Components of Urbansim , 2000 .

[6]  B Pérez,et al.  TRANUS-J: Putting Large Models into Small Computers , 1984 .

[8]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[9]  C Ding The GIS-Based Human-Interactive TAZ Design Algorithm: Examining the Impacts of Data Aggregation on Transportation-Planning Analysis , 1998 .

[10]  M. Markus,et al.  On-off intermittency and intermingledlike basins in a granular medium. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  S. Openshaw Ecological Fallacies and the Analysis of Areal Census Data , 1984, Environment & planning A.

[12]  Paul Waddell,et al.  Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning , 2007 .

[13]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  An Empirical Study of Some Zone-Design Criteria , 1978 .

[14]  John Stillwell,et al.  Understanding the 2001 UK census migration and commuting data: the effect of small cell adjustment and problems of comparison with 1991 , 2007 .

[15]  E. Hillsman,et al.  Errors in measuring distances from populations to service centers , 1978 .

[16]  B. G. Hutchinson,et al.  Goodness of fit statistics for trip distribution models , 1981 .

[17]  A. Curtis,et al.  The Zone Definition Problem in Location-Allocation Modeling , 2010 .

[18]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended Constrained Cellular Automata land use model , 2009 .

[19]  I Williams,et al.  AN EFFICIENT DESIGN FOR VERY LARGE TRANSPORT MODELS ON PCS , 2002 .

[20]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Modeling urban growth using a variable grid cellular automaton , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[21]  David Martin,et al.  The Application of Zone-Design Methodology in the 2001 UK Census , 2001 .

[22]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  Reducing aggregation error in spatial interaction models by location sampling , 2011 .

[23]  Roger White,et al.  The Use of Constrained Cellular Automata for High-Resolution Modelling of Urban Land-Use Dynamics , 1997 .

[24]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[25]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  The Aggregation Problem in Location-Allocation , 2010 .

[26]  Steen Rasmussen,et al.  Urban growth simulation from "first principles". , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[28]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[29]  Steen Rasmussen,et al.  Urban Settlement Transitions , 2002 .

[30]  Marcial Echenique Econometric Models of Land Use and Transportation , 2004 .

[31]  David J. Martin,et al.  Towards the Geographies of the 2001 UK Census of Population , 2000 .

[32]  C. Guare Error, precision, and uncertainty , 1991 .

[33]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[34]  C. Sancar,et al.  Integration of planning models and GIS in defining urban development areas , 2010 .

[35]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS , 2000 .

[36]  J. LeSage,et al.  Spatial Econometric Modeling of Origin-Destination Flows , 2008 .

[37]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Exponential or Power Distance-Decay for Commuting? An Alternative Specification , 2005 .

[38]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 2004 .

[39]  Chris Webster,et al.  Regulation, Land-Use Mix, and Urban Performance. Part 2: Simulation , 1999 .

[40]  P. Colella,et al.  Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics , 1989 .

[41]  Pim Martens,et al.  Map Comparison Methods for Comprehensive Assessment of Geosimulation Models , 2008, ICCSA.

[42]  Caroline Young,et al.  Geographically intelligent disclosure control for flexible aggregation of census data , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[43]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .