Optimization of gas-sensitive polymer arrays using combinations of heterogeneous and homogeneous subarrays

Results for optimizing an array of conducting polymer gas sensors for sensing one of five analytes in the presence of up to four interferents are presented. The optimized array consists of subarrays of homogeneous (like) sensors contributing to a larger heterogeneous array of up to ten points (unlike sensors) in multidimensional sensor space. The optimization techniques presented here are linear, since the polymer sensors in their useful (low concentration) operating range exhibit linear and additive response characteristics. The optimization of these arrays produces maximum separability between analytes, demonstrating the trade-off between the addition of both information and variability induced by increasing the size of the heterogeneous array. Optimization results for sensing acetone, hexane, THF, toluene, and ethanol in the presence of interferents result in array sizes that are significantly less than the maximum available number of sensors (ten in the heterogeneous partition of the array). This result adds fuel to the argument that fewer sensors are better; the argument for more sensors, however, is also made in the context of the electronic nose systems where significant chemical diversity is required. Homogeneous subarrays of up to four elements each improve the separability of analytes in these optimized heterogeneous arrays by over 10% and also effectively flag broken or unhealthy sensors in a manner that is independent of analyte and concentration.

[1]  Taint and odour related quality monitoring of two food packaging board products using gas chromatography, gas sensors and sensory analysis , 1999 .

[2]  Naresh Magan,et al.  Evaluation of a radial basis function neural network for the determination of wheat quality from electronic nose data , 2000 .

[3]  D. Dubourdieu,et al.  Using electronic odor sensors to discriminate among oak barrel toasting levels. , 1999, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[4]  R. Paolesse,et al.  Application of a combined artificial olfaction and taste system to the quantification of relevant compounds in red wine , 2000 .

[5]  R. W. Marshall,et al.  Detection and simultaneous identification of microorganisms from headspace samples using an electronic nose. , 1997 .

[6]  J. Kauer,et al.  Convergent, self-encoded bead sensor arrays in the design of an artificial nose. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Cameron Brown,et al.  Integrated surface acoustic-wave and semiconducting-metal-oxide sensor array , 1999, Optics East.

[8]  Kevin A. Vetelino,et al.  Detection of organic chemicals by SAW sensor array , 1999 .

[9]  Giuliano Martinelli,et al.  Array of thick film sensors for atmospheric pollutant monitoring , 2000 .

[10]  P. Gubian,et al.  Identification and quantification of methane and ethyl alcohol in an environment at variable humidity by an hybrid array , 1997 .

[11]  Jay W. Grate,et al.  Chemical information from polymer-coated acoustic-wave sensor arrays , 1999, Optics East.

[12]  Joel White,et al.  Optical arrays and pattern recognition in the design of an artificial nose , 1996, Photonics West.

[13]  Przemyslaw M. Szecowka,et al.  Simultaneous quantification of carbon monoxide and methane in humid air using a sensor array and an artificial neural network , 1997 .

[14]  Julian W. Gardner,et al.  Performance definition and standardization of electronic noses , 1996 .

[15]  J. Gardner,et al.  An electronic nose system to diagnose illness , 2000 .

[16]  Stephen A. Casalnuovo,et al.  Integrated chemiresistor array for small sensor platforms , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  Dean Smith,et al.  Fish freshness sensor , 1999, Optics East.

[18]  Maria Luz Rodriguez-Mendez,et al.  Array of sensors based on conducting polymers for the quality control of the aroma of the virgin olive oil , 2000 .

[19]  Joel White,et al.  Fiber optic array sensors as an architecture for an artificial nose , 1995, European Symposium on Optics for Environmental and Public Safety.

[20]  Fredrik Winquist,et al.  Performance of an electronic nose for quality estimation of ground meat , 1993 .

[21]  F. Winquist,et al.  Electronic nose for microbial quality classification of grains. , 1997, International journal of food microbiology.

[22]  Nathan S. Lewis,et al.  Vapor sensing with arrays of carbon black-polymer composites , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[23]  D. S. Vlachos,et al.  Fuzzy neural networks for gas sensing , 1996 .

[24]  Wang Ping,et al.  A novel recognition method for electronic nose using artificial neural network and fuzzy recognition , 1996 .

[25]  Nathan S. Lewis,et al.  Array-based vapor sensing using chemically sensitive carbon black-polymer resistors , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[26]  D. L. Baldwin,et al.  Development and calibration of field-effect transistor-based sensor array for measurement of hydrogen and ammonia gas mixtures in humid air. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  I. Lundstrom,et al.  Artificial neural networks and statistical pattern recognition improve MOSFET gas sensor array calibration , 1991, TRANSDUCERS '91: 1991 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators. Digest of Technical Papers.

[28]  P. Travers,et al.  A method for selecting an optimum sensor array , 2000 .

[29]  Michael P. Craven,et al.  The prediction of bacteria type and culture growth phase by an electronic nose with a multi-layer pe , 1998 .

[30]  Eduard Llobet,et al.  Fruit ripeness monitoring using an Electronic Nose , 2000 .

[31]  Patrick Mielle,et al.  Gas Sensors Arrays (‘Electronic Noses’): a study about the speed/accuracy ratio , 2000 .

[32]  M. Koudelka-Hep,et al.  Reproducible fabrication of an array of gas-sensitive chemo-resistors with commercially available polyaniline , 2000 .

[33]  P. E. Keller,et al.  Electronic noses and their applications , 1995, IEEE Technical Applications Conference and Workshops. Northcon/95. Conference Record.

[34]  Udo Weimar,et al.  Odours and flavours identified with hybrid modular sensor systems1 , 1997 .

[35]  Pietro Siciliano,et al.  Odor discrimination using adaptive resonance theory , 2000 .

[36]  Ingemar Lundström,et al.  Identification of paper quality using a hybrid electronic nose , 1995 .

[37]  Antonella Macagnano,et al.  Multicomponent analysis on polluted waters by means of an electronic tongue , 1997 .

[38]  Masatoshi Ishikawa,et al.  An active sensing method using estimated errors for multisensor fusion systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[39]  N. Lewis,et al.  A chemically diverse conducting polymer-based "electronic nose". , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Gerhard Niebling,et al.  Design of sensor arrays by use of an inverse feature space , 1995 .

[41]  Peter Boeker,et al.  Monolithic sensor array based on a quartz microbalance transducer with enhanced sensitivity for monitoring agricultural emissions , 2000 .

[42]  J. Gardner,et al.  An electronic nose system for monitoring the quality of potable water , 2000 .

[43]  John S. Kauer,et al.  Identification of Multiple Analytes Using an Optical Sensor Array and Pattern Recognition Neural Networks , 1997 .

[44]  Eduard Llobet,et al.  Non-destructive banana ripeness determination using a neural network-based electronic nose , 1999 .

[45]  Martine Lumbreras,et al.  Detection of two gases in air-conditioned system with an array of TGS sensors , 1999, Optics East.