Title High-resolution ice-thickness mapping in South Greenland Permalink

Airborne radar sounding is difficult in South Greenland because of the presence of englacial water, which prevents the signal from reaching the bed. Data coverage remains suboptimal for traditional methods of ice-thickness and bed mapping that rely on geostatistical techniques, such as kriging, because important features are missing. Here we apply two alternative approaches of highresolution ( 300m) ice-thickness mapping, that are based on the conservation of mass, to two regions of South Greenland: (1) Qooqqup Sermia and Kiattuut Sermiat, and (2) Ikertivaq. These two algorithms solve optimization problems, for which the conservation of mass is either enforced as a hard constraint, or as a soft constraint. For the first region, very few measurements are available but there is no gap in ice motion data, whereas for Ikertivaq, more ice-thickness measurements are available, but there are gaps in ice motion data. We show that mass-conservation algorithms can be used as validation tools for radar sounding. We also show that it is preferable to apply mass conservation as a hard constraint, rather than a soft constraint, as it better preserves elongated features, such as glacial valleys and ridges.

[1]  Roland C. Warner,et al.  Derivation of ice thickness and bedrock topography in data-gap regions over Antarctica , 2000, Annals of Glaciology.

[2]  M. Morlighem,et al.  A mass conservation approach for mapping glacier ice thickness , 2011, Geophysical Research Letters.

[3]  Bo Sun,et al.  Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica , 2012 .

[4]  Eric Rignot,et al.  Ice flux divergence anomalies on 79north Glacier, Greenland , 2011 .

[5]  Eric Rignot,et al.  Ice flow in Greenland for the International Polar Year 2008–2009 , 2012 .

[6]  M. R. van den Broeke,et al.  Higher surface mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet revealed by high‐resolution climate modeling , 2009 .

[7]  L. A. Rasmussen Bed Topography and Mass-Balance Distribution of Columbia Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A., Determined from Sequential Aerial Photography , 1988, Journal of Glaciology.

[8]  J. Paden,et al.  High-resolution bed topography mapping of Russell Glacier, Greenland, inferred from Operation IceBridge data , 2013 .

[9]  F. Pattyn A new three-dimensional higher-order thermomechanical ice sheet model: Basic sensitivity, ice stream development, and ice flow across subglacial lakes , 2003 .

[10]  Ian M. Howat,et al.  Greenland flow variability from ice-sheet-wide velocity mapping , 2010, Journal of Glaciology.

[11]  H. Blatter Velocity and stress fields in grounded glaciers: a simple algorithm for including deviatoric stress gradients , 1995 .

[12]  Beáta Csathó,et al.  A New Methodology for Detecting Ice Sheet Surface Elevation Changes From Laser Altimetry Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Xiaoqing Wu,et al.  Ice Sheet Bed Mapping With Airborne SAR Tomography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[15]  Ian M. Howat,et al.  A new bed elevation dataset for Greenland , 2012 .

[16]  B. M. Ewen Smith,et al.  Radio Echo Sounding: Absorption and Scattering by Water Inclusion and Ice Lenses , 1972 .

[17]  Sivaprasad Gogineni,et al.  A new ice thickness and bed data set for the Greenland ice sheet: 1. Measurement, data reduction, and errors , 2001 .

[18]  M. E. Peters,et al.  Echo source discrimination in single-pass airborne radar sounding data from the Dry Valleys, Antarctica: Implications for orbital sounding of Mars , 2006 .

[19]  J. Legarsky,et al.  Coherent radar ice thickness measurements over the Greenland ice sheet , 2001 .