Dialog Convergence and Learning

In this paper we examine whether the student-to-tutor convergence of lexical and speech features is a useful predictor of learning in a corpus of spoken tutorial dialogs. This possibility is raised by the Interactive Alignment Theory, which suggests a connection between convergence of speech features and the amount of semantic alignment between partners in a dialog. A number of studies have shown that users converge their speech productions toward dialog systems. If, as we hypothesize, semantic alignment between a student and a tutor (or tutoring system) is associated with learning, then this convergence may be correlated with learning gains. We present evidence that both lexical convergence and convergence of an acoustic/prosodic feature are useful features for predicting learning in our corpora. We also find that our measure of lexical convergence provides a stronger correlation with learning in a human/computer corpus than did a previous measure of lexical cohesion.

[1]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[3]  M. Heldner,et al.  Prosodic adaptation in human , 2003 .

[4]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System , 2004, NAACL.

[5]  Arthur Ward Measuring Convergence and Priming in Tutorial Dialog , 2007 .

[6]  C. Rosé The Role of Why Questions in Effective Human Tutoring , 2003 .

[7]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[8]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Priming of Syntactic Rules in Task-Oriented Dialogue and Spontaneous Conversation , 2006 .

[9]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Architecture of Why2-Atlas: A Coach for Qualitative Physics Essay Writing , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Susan E. Brennan,et al.  LEXICAL ENTRAINMENT IN SPONTANEOUS DIALOG , 1996 .

[11]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Amplitude convergence in children²s conversational speech with animated personas , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[12]  Brady Clark,et al.  Responding to Student Uncertainty in Spoken Tutorial Dialogue Systems , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[13]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction , 2003 .

[14]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[15]  Joel R. Tetreault,et al.  Comparing Linguistic Features for Modeling Learning in Computer Tutoring , 2007, AIED.

[16]  Claus Zinn,et al.  The Role of Initiative in Tutorial Dialogue , 2003, EACL.

[17]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Cohesion and Learning in a Tutorial Spoken Dialog System , 2006, FLAIRS Conference.

[18]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[19]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Correlating student acoustic-prosodic profiles with student learning in spoken tutoring dialogues , 2005, INTERSPEECH.