Deconstructing the Indexing Process

Absence de theorie qui rende compte du processus d'indexation. Analyse du processus d'indexation: l'auteur montre que les etapes d'indexation peuvent etre vues comme des interpretations. Les deux concepts de l'indexation: une conception basee sur le document lui-meme et une conception basee sur les besoins (et besoins potentiels) de l'utilisateur. Role fondamental de la pertinence

[1]  Daniel Benediktsson,et al.  Hermeneutics: dimensions toward LIS thinking , 1989 .

[2]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Topical Relevance Relationships. I. Why Topic Matching Fails , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Jessica L. Milstead.  Needs for research in indexing , 1994 .

[4]  William S. Cooper,et al.  Indexing documents by gedanken experimentation , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Francis Miksa.  The subject in the dictionary catalog from Cutter to the present , 1983 .

[6]  Elaine Svenonius,et al.  Theory of Subject Analysis: A Sourcebook , 1985 .

[7]  Brian Vickery,et al.  Metatheory and information science , 1997, J. Documentation.

[8]  J. Farrow.  All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing , 1995 .

[9]  John F. Farrow,et al.  A Cognitive Process Model of Document Indexing , 1991, J. Documentation.

[10]  GreenRebecca.  Topical relevance relationships. I , 1995 .

[11]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Research Needs in Information Science. , 1993 .

[12]  Taemin Kim Park.  Toward a theory of user-based relevance: a call for a new paradigm of inquiry , 1994 .

[13]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science , 1997 .

[14]  William S. Cooper,et al.  A definition of relevance for information retrieval , 1971, Inf. Storage Retr..

[15]  Bernd Frohmann,et al.  Rules of Indexing: a Critique of Mentalism in Information Retrieval Theory , 1990, J. Documentation.

[16]  D. C. Blair,et al.  Language and Representation in Information Retrieval , 1990 .

[17]  Jason Farradane,et al.  The nature of information , 1979 .

[18]  B. Weinberg.  Why indexing fails the researcher , 1988, The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 16, Issue 1.

[19]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Subject access in online catalogs: A design model , 1986 .

[20]  Kevin P. Jones.  TOWARDS A THEORY OF INDEXING , 1976 .

[21]  Derek Austin,et al.  PROGRESS IN DOCUMENTATION: THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRECIS: A THEORETICAL AND TECHNICAL HISTORY , 1974 .

[22]  H. Gardner.  The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution , 1985 .

[23]  Raya Fidel.  User-centered indexing , 1994 .

[24]  Carol L. Barry.  User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .

[25]  W. J. Hutchins.  The concept of “aboutness” in subject indexing , 1997 .

[26]  Ian V. Cornelius.  Meaning and Method in Information Studies , 1996 .

[27]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Information Retrieval as a Trial-And-Error Process , 1977, The Library Quarterly.

[28]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[29]  Melvil Dewey.  Decimal classification and relative index , 1942 .

[30]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  Organizing information - principles of data base and retrieval systems , 1985 .

[31]  Clare Beghtol,et al.  Bibliographic Classification Theory and Text Linguistics: Aboutness Analysis, intertextuality and the Cognitive Act of Classifying Documents , 1986, J. Documentation.

[32]  Clara M. Chu,et al.  Subject analysis: the critical first stage in indexing , 1993, J. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Michael K. Buckland.  Relatedness, relevance and responsiveness in retrieval systems , 1983, Inf. Process. Manag..

[34]  Hanne Albrechtsen,et al.  Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis , 1993, The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 18, Issue 4.

[35]  Kevin P. Jones.  How do we Index?: a Report of some Aslib Informatics Group Activity , 1983, J. Documentation.