Group strategic decision making: asynchronous GSS using structured conflict and consensus approaches

This longitudinal experiment investigated the efficiency, effectiveness and group member perceptions of dialectical inquiry (DI) and constructive consensus (CC) approaches to strategic decision making in an asynchronous (distributed) computer-mediated-communications (CMC) environment. There were no differences between DI and CC groups in terms of decision effectiveness. DI groups required significantly more asynchronous meeting time to complete their recommendations and had higher perceived depth of evaluation than CC groups. CC groups reported greater decision acceptance and willingness to work together again than DI groups. Relatively few experiential effects were observed. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for group support systems research and design.<<ETX>>

[1]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[2]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Dialectical inquiring systems: A new methodology for information science , 1972, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Dispersed Group Decision Making Using Nonsimultaneous Computer Conferencing: A Report of Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  An experiment in dialectic information systems , 1974, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[8]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making. , 1982 .

[9]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  A meta‐analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry , 1989 .

[10]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  An empirical investigation of the impact of computer support on group development and decision-making performance , 1989 .

[11]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Assumptional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem Solving , 1979 .

[12]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System* , 1991 .

[13]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Computer‐mediated communication requirements for group support , 1991 .

[14]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Victoria K. Clawson,et al.  The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings , 1993 .

[16]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed group support: a preliminary analysis of the effects of the use of voting tools and sequential procedures , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Effects of Devil′s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups , 1994 .

[18]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The effects of formal human leadership and computer-generated decision aids on problem solving via computer : a controlled experiment , 1982 .

[19]  M. Lynn.  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[20]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[22]  Lai Lai Tung,et al.  The effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus inquiry methods in a GSS environment , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning , 1969 .

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[25]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[26]  David L. Ford,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF TWO NORMATIVE STRUCTURAL INTERVENTIONS ON ESTABLISHED AND AD HOC GROUPS: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVING DECISION MAKING EFFECTIVENESS , 1976 .

[27]  Charles R. Schwenk.  Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[28]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[29]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[30]  Randall Steeb,et al.  A Computer-Based Interactive System for Group Decisionmaking , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[31]  Jerry Lennert Fjermestad.  Group strategic decision-making in a computer-mediated-communications environment: a comparison of dialectical inquiry and constructive consensus approaches , 1994 .

[32]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[34]  R. Mason.  Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[35]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[36]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[38]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Communication and Group Decision-Making , 1986 .

[39]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[40]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[41]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[42]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Decision Support: The Effects of Designated Human Leaders and Statistical Feedback in Computerized Conferences , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..