Stylized algorithmic trading: satisfying the predictive near-term demand of liquidity

Regulatory reform enacted (e.g., the Dodd-Frank Act enforced in the U.S.) requires the financial service industry to consider the “reasonably expected near term demand” (i.e., RENTD) in trading. To manage the price impact and transaction cost associated with orders submitted to an order driven market, market makers or specialists must determine their trading styles (aggressive, neutral, or passive) based on the market liquidity in response to RENTD, particularly for trading a large quantity of some financial instrument. In this article we introduce a model considering different trading styles to satisfy the predictive near-term customer demand of market liquidity in order to find an optimal order submission strategy based on different market situations. We show some analytical properties and numerical performances of our model in search of optimal solutions. We evaluate the performances of our model with simulations run over a set of experiments in comparison with two alternative strategies. Our results suggest that the proposed model illustrates superiority in performance.

[1]  Tarun Chordia,et al.  The Impact of Trades on Daily Volatility , 2004 .

[2]  Anatoly B. Schmidt,et al.  Empirical Market Microstructure , 2011 .

[3]  Edward M. H. Lin,et al.  Systemic risk, financial markets, and performance of financial institutions , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Anna A. Obizhaeva,et al.  Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics , 2013 .

[5]  Alexander Schied,et al.  Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions , 2007, 0708.1756.

[6]  Edward W. Sun,et al.  Financial Transaction Tax: Policy Analytics Based on Optimal Trading , 2015 .

[7]  D. Bertsimas,et al.  Optimal control of execution costs , 1998 .

[8]  David Easley,et al.  Flow Toxicity and Liquidity in a High Frequency World , 2012 .

[9]  M. Warachka,et al.  Optimal liquidation strategies and their implications , 2007 .

[10]  Anne Jones Dorn,et al.  Trading as Gambling , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Gur Huberman,et al.  Price Manipulation and Quasi-Arbitrage , 2004 .

[12]  Michael A. Goldstein,et al.  Brokerage Commissions and Institutional Trading Patterns , 2007 .

[13]  Giuseppe Nuti,et al.  Algorithmic Trading , 2011, Computer.

[14]  Anna A. Obizhaeva,et al.  Smooth Trading with Overconfidence and Market Power , 2016 .

[15]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  High frequency market microstructure. , 2015 .

[16]  Gur Huberman,et al.  Arbitrage-Free Price-Update and Price-Impact Functions , 2000 .

[17]  Market Microstructure Invariance: Empirical Hypotheses , 2016 .

[18]  H. Bessembinder,et al.  Liquidity, Resiliency and Market Quality Around Predictable Trades: Theory and Evidence , 2015 .

[19]  Robert Kissell,et al.  The Science of Algorithmic Trading and Portfolio Management , 2013 .

[20]  George Chacko,et al.  The Price of Immediacy , 2008 .

[21]  Robert Almgren,et al.  Optimal execution of portfolio trans-actions , 2000 .

[22]  Austin Gerig,et al.  Automated Liquidity Provision , 2014 .

[23]  Edward W. Sun,et al.  High frequency trading, liquidity, and execution cost , 2013, Annals of Operations Research.

[24]  L. Harris Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners , 2002 .

[25]  Marco Pagano,et al.  Market Liquidity: Theory, Evidence, and Policy , 2013 .

[26]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  Market Microstructure Theory , 1995 .

[27]  Robert Almgren,et al.  Optimal execution with nonlinear impact functions and trading-enhanced risk , 2003 .

[28]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  Can Private Money Buy Public Science? Disease Group Lobbying and Federal Funding for Biomedical Research , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Ingrid M. Werner NYSE order flow, spreads, and information , 2003 .

[30]  Alexander Schied,et al.  Risk Aversion and the Dynamics of Optimal Liquidation Strategies in Illiquid Markets , 2008 .