Goal neglect and Spearman's g: competing parts of a complex task.

In goal neglect, a person ignores some task requirement though being able to describe it. Goal neglect is closely related to general intelligence or C. Spearman's (1904) g (J. Duncan, H. Emslie, P. Williams, R. Johnson, & C. Freer, 1996). The authors tested the role of task complexity in neglect and the hypothesis that different task components in some sense compete for attention. In contrast to many kinds of attentional limits, increasing the real-time demands of one task component does not promote neglect of another. Neither does neglect depend on preparation for different possible events in a block of trials. Instead, the key factor is complexity in the whole body of knowledge specified in task instructions. The authors suggest that as novel activity is constructed, relevant facts, rules, and requirements must be organized into a "task model." As this model increases in complexity, different task components compete for representation, and vulnerable components may be lost. Construction of effective task models is closely linked to g.

[1]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[3]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[4]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  J. Duncan.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: Brain mechanisms of attention , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Richardson.  Clinical and Neuropsychological Aspects of Closed Head Injury , 1990 .

[7]  E. Miller,et al.  Task-specific neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  G. Wylie,et al.  Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. , 1999 .

[10]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[11]  Patrick Bourke,et al.  A General Factor Involved in Dual-task Performance Decrement: , 1996 .

[12]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[13]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[15]  Richard D. Roberts,et al.  Hick's law, competing-task performance, and intelligence , 1988 .

[16]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data , 1991 .

[17]  Jonathan D. Wallis,et al.  A Comparison of Abstract Rules in the Prefrontal Cortex, Premotor Cortex, Inferior Temporal Cortex, and Striatum , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Michaela Swales,et al.  Frontal Lobe Deficits after Head Injury: Unity and Diversity of Function , 1997 .

[19]  Lazar Stankov,et al.  Complexity, Metacognition, and Fluid Intelligence , 2000 .

[20]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[21]  P A Bourke.  Measuring Attentional Demand in Continuous Dual-task Performance , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  J. Duncan.  An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex , 2001 .

[23]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[24]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[25]  Georgina Spilsbury,et al.  Complexity as a Reflection of the Dimensionality of a Task. , 1992 .

[26]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[28]  J. Duncan,et al.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  R. Cattell,et al.  Abilities : Their Structure , Growth , and Action , 2015 .

[30]  C. Spearman,et al.  "THE ABILITIES OF MAN". , 1928, Science.

[31]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[33]  Newell,et al.  A neural basis for general intelligence , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  David F. Lohman,et al.  The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence , 1983 .

[35]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  H. Niki,et al.  Encoding of behavioral significance of visual stimuli by primate prefrontal neurons: relation to relevant task conditions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  K. Berman,et al.  Context-dependent, neural system-specific neurophysiological concomitants of ageing: mapping PET correlates during cognitive activation. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.

[39]  Lowe Bryan William,et al.  Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. , 1899 .

[40]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[43]  J. Assad,et al.  Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex , 2002, Nature.

[44]  Gerard J. Fogarty,et al.  Abilities involved in performance on competing tasks , 1988 .

[45]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Outsourcing cognitive control to the environment: Adult age differences in the use of task cues , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  A. Luria.  Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[47]  G. Claxton.  Cognitive psychology: New directions , 1980 .

[48]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[49]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .

[50]  P. McLeod,et al.  Measuring the mind speed, control, and age , 2005 .

[51]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[52]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Prefrontal and cingulate unit activity during timing behavior in the monkey , 1979, Brain Research.

[53]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  C. Spearman.  General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .

[55]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[56]  John Duncan,et al.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities , 1997, Nature.

[57]  J. Duncan,et al.  Filtering of neural signals by focused attention in the monkey prefrontal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[59]  J. O. Urmson,et al.  The William James Lectures , 1963 .

[60]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[61]  P. Ackerman.  Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[62]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Changes in Event-Based Prospective Memory Across Adulthood , 1998 .

[63]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  J W Kalsbeek,et al.  Objective measurement of mental load. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[65]  J. Desmond,et al.  Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[67]  E. Procyk,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity during routine and non-routine sequential behaviors in macaques , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .