Reliability assessment of serviceability performance of braced retaining walls using a neural network approach

In urban environments, one major concern with deep excavations in soft clay is the potentially large ground deformations in and around the excavation. Excessive movements can damage adjacent buildings and utilities. There are many uncertainties associated with the calculation of the ultimate or serviceability performance of a braced excavation system. These include the variabilities of the loadings, geotechnical soil properties, and engineering and geometrical properties of the wall. A risk-based approach to serviceability performance failure is necessary to incorporate systematically the uncertainties associated with the various design parameters. This paper demonstrates the use of an integrated neural network-reliability method to assess the risk of serviceability failure through the calculation of the reliability index. By first performing a series of parametric studies using the finite element method and then approximating the non-linear limit state surface (the boundary separating the safe and 'failure' domains) through a neural network model, the reliability index can be determined with the aid of a spreadsheet. Two illustrative examples are presented to show how the serviceability performance for braced excavation problems can be assessed using the reliability index.

[1]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[2]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[3]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory , 2004 .

[4]  Norihiko Miura,et al.  RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF A TEST EMBANKMENT BY VARIANCE REDUCTION AND NEAREST-NEIGHBOR METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 11-15 APRIL 1988, INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA. VOLUMES 1 - 3 , 1988 .

[5]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[6]  A. Goh.  Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks , 1994 .

[7]  P. Hajela,et al.  Applications of Neural Networks in Modeling and Design of Structural Systems , 1999, Neural Networks in the Analysis and Design of Structures.

[8]  K. Phoon,et al.  Characterization of Geotechnical Variability , 1999 .

[9]  J. M. Duncan,et al.  Factors of Safety and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering , 2000 .

[10]  F. S. Wong,et al.  Slope Reliability and Response Surface Method , 1985 .

[11]  C. H. Juang,et al.  Reliability-based method for assessing liquefaction potential of soils , 1999 .

[12]  G. Baecher.  Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering , 2003 .

[13]  S Lacasse.  THE IMPORTANCE OF DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTIES IN FOUNDATION ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[14]  H. Gomes,et al.  COMPARISON OF RESPONSE SURFACE AND NEURAL NETWORK WITH OTHER METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[15]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  Empirical design in geotechnics using neural networks , 1995 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[17]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Neural network PC tools: a practical guide , 1990 .

[18]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[19]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[20]  Shih-Lin Hung,et al.  NEURAL NETWORK FORECAST MODEL IN DEEP EXCAVATION , 2002 .

[21]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Comparison of finite element reliability methods , 2002 .

[22]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .

[23]  Michel Ghosn,et al.  Development of a shredding genetic algorithm for structural reliability , 2005 .

[24]  Ping-Sien Lin,et al.  Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils , 2003 .

[25]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Knowledge-Based Modeling of Material Behavior with Neural Networks , 1992 .

[26]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[27]  David M. Potts,et al.  The influence of pile group loading on existing tunnels , 2001 .

[28]  Xibing Li,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network , 2005 .

[29]  Jerzy Bauer,et al.  Reliability with respect to settlement limit-states of shallow foundations on linearly-deformable subsoil , 2000 .

[30]  C. H. Juang,et al.  CPT-based liquefaction analysis, Part 2: Reliability for design , 2000 .

[31]  C. Cherubini,et al.  Probabilistic approach to the design of anchored sheet pile walls , 2000 .

[32]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data , 2003 .

[33]  Helmut Schweiger,et al.  Reliability Analysis in Geotechnics with Deterministic Finite Elements Theoretical Concepts and Practical Application , 2001 .

[34]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[35]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[36]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Bearing capacity of spatially random soil: the undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited , 2001 .

[37]  L. Faravelli.  Response‐Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis , 1989 .

[38]  M. Deaton,et al.  Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses , 1989 .

[39]  M. Shinozuka.  Basic Analysis of Structural Safety , 1983 .

[40]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Probabilistic Foundation Settlement on Spatially Random Soil , 2002 .

[41]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Appraising cone penetration test based liquefaction resistance evaluation methods: artificial neural network approach , 1999 .