ON THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE PAY AND NONCONTINGENT INCENTIVES

We report evidence from a large field experiment that compares the effectiveness of contingent and noncontingent incentives in eliciting costly effort for a large range of payment levels. The company with which we worked sent 7,250 letters asking customers to complete a survey. Some letters promised to pay amounts ranging from $1 to $30 upon compliance (contingent incentives), whereas others already contained the money in the request envelopes (noncontingent incentives). Compared to no payment, very small contingent payments lower the response rate while small noncontingent payments raise the response rate. As expected, response rates rise with the size of the incentive offered. The response rate in the noncontingent incentives rises more rapidly for low amounts of incentive, but then flattens out and reaches lower levels than under contingent payments. We discuss how the optimal policy regarding the use of each size and type of incentives crucially depends on firms’ objectives.

[1]  Armin Falk,et al.  Gift Exchange in the Field , 2007 .

[2]  Joel Sobel,et al.  INTERDEPENDENT PREFERENCES AND RECIPROCITY , 2005 .

[3]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[5]  Graham Kalton,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation. , 1972 .

[6]  J. List,et al.  Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments , 2006 .

[7]  M. H. Quenouille,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation , 1973 .

[8]  G. Charness.  Attribution and Reciprocity in an Experimental Labor Market , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[9]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  UNDERSTANDING MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE BEHAVIOR , 2004 .

[10]  T. Bewley.  Why Wages Don't Fall during a Recession , 1999 .

[11]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[12]  A. H. Church.  ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[13]  Aurélie Bonein.  Social Comparison and Peer effects with Heterogeneous Ability , 2014 .

[14]  Ernan Haruvy,et al.  Altruism, Equity, and Reciprocity in a Gift Exchange Experiment: An Encompassing Approach , 1999, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Do People Behave in Experiments as in the Field? Evidence from Donations , 2006 .

[16]  U. Gneezy,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 25, Number 4—Fall 2011—Pages 191–210 When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior , 2022 .

[17]  J. List.  The Behavioralist Meets the Market: Measuring Social Preferences and Reputation Effects in Actual Transactions , 2005 .

[18]  Parita Mukta,et al.  The Gift Relationship , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Richard M. Titmuss,et al.  The gift relationship , 1970 .

[20]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1991 .

[21]  J. List,et al.  Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving , 2009, The quarterly journal of economics.

[22]  George A. Akerlof.  Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[23]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation , 2000 .

[24]  Rainer Michael Rilke,et al.  Reducing Ambiguity in Lotteries: That Knowing is Better than Wondering , 2015 .

[25]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[26]  D. Jobber,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Prepaid Monetary Incentives on Mail-Survey Response , 1988 .

[27]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[28]  John Saunders,et al.  Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response , 2004 .

[29]  E. Fehr,et al.  Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation , 1993 .

[30]  J. Armstrong.  Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys , 1975 .