Hand-in-hand with the current renewed emphasis on student success and a resurgence of Writing Across the Curriculum, instructors in all disciplines need to refocus on Reading Across the Curriculum to address students' needs, to achieve instructional goals, and to prepare citizens for full participation in our democracy. It seems clear that a refocused emphasis on reading as the process of getting meaning from print to be used for analysis, synthesis and evaluation, in the context of critical literacy across the curriculum could potentially address the difficulties of students, the goals of teachers and the needs of the nation for an educated, informed, fully participatory democratic population. These goals can be achieved through four specific strategies that can make faster, better reading possible for everyone, including, first, an understanding of the nature of the reading process; second, a consistent focus on direct classroom teaching of critical reading skills that go beyond comprehension; third, opportunities for modeling and practice of these critical reading skills; and fourth, the development of an understanding of the conventions of disciplines and the genres used in an array of academic areas. As an undergraduate, I took most of my courses with a professor who was a specialist in medieval literature. In one of those courses, he described a method of annotation used in medieval texts. Readers (mostly priests or other trained religious leaders) would mark important parts of a text by drawing a picture of a small hand in the margin, with the index finger of the hand pointing to significant passages. I was intrigued by this strategy and began using it to mark textbooks I was reading for all my courses, not just my English classes. To draw those little hands, though, I had to be a good reader; I had to be able to read not just to understand the texts I was reading but also to know which were the important parts to mark with the little hands and to know how to use those important parts to analyze, synthesize and evaluate the text. Recent research shows that about half of current college students lack these skills (American College Testing, 2006). Hand-in-hand with the current renewed emphasis on student success and a resurgence of Writing Across the Curriculum, instructors in all disciplines need to refocus on Reading Across the Curriculum to address students' needs, to achieve instructional goals, and to prepare citizens for full participation in our democracy. Focused instruction in clearly defined critical reading is urgent and essential, and even more important as digital texts and electronic searching increasingly dominate the reading landscape (Battelle, 2005; Kelly, 2006). Recent studies also show that only half the students who start college manage to complete a degree (U.S. Dept. of Education, 2005). The inability to read well is surely tied to this abysmal level of degree completion, so to improve student success, the reading problem must be addressed. Teachers all across the curriculum, and from K to college, need to renew their focus on
[1]
L. Flower,et al.
Reading-to-Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process
,
1990
.
[2]
Kathleen M. H. Brady.
National Center for Education Statistics Home Page
,
2000
.
[3]
Cedar Riener,et al.
My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student
,
2006
.
[4]
Jean-Paul Hautecoeur.
Editorial Introduction Literacy in the Age of Information: Knowledge, Power or Domination?
,
2000
.
[5]
Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.
Adult Literacy in OECD Countries: Technical Report on the First International Adult Literacy Survey.
,
1998
.
[6]
James J. Duderstadt,et al.
A Test of Leadership - Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education
,
2006
.
[7]
S. Wilson.
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy
,
2006
.
[8]
Richard H. Haswell,et al.
Context and Rhetorical Reading Strategies
,
1999
.
[9]
Robert B. Ruddell,et al.
Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging From the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies
,
2004
.
[10]
Rebecca Moore Howard,et al.
Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty
,
1995,
College English.
[11]
Charles Bazerman,et al.
Persuasion at a Distance. (Book Reviews: Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.)
,
1990
.
[12]
S. Pinker.
The Language Instinct
,
1994
.
[13]
Ben Gerson.
The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture
,
2005
.
[14]
Tony Becher,et al.
Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines
,
2001
.
[15]
A. Sunmade.
The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century
,
2008
.
[16]
Stephen Krashen,et al.
The Din in the Head, Input, and the Language Acquisition Device
,
1983
.
[17]
Stephen B. Kucer,et al.
Dimensions of Literacy: A Conceptual Base for Teaching Reading and Writing in School Settings
,
2004
.
[18]
Nancy Nelson Spivey,et al.
The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning
,
1996
.
[19]
Ellin Oliver Keene,et al.
Mosaic of Thought: Teaching Comprehension in a Reader's Workshop
,
1997
.
[20]
K. Yancey.
Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key
,
2004
.
[21]
Bonnie Nichols,et al.
Reading At Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. Research Division Report #46.
,
2004
.
[22]
Juan Antonio Barcat,et al.
[On reading].
,
2006,
Medicina.
[23]
Andrew Richard Albanese.
Scan This Book
,
2007
.
[24]
Kathleen Blake Yancey,et al.
WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition.
,
2001
.
[25]
Alice Horning.
Teaching writing as a second language
,
1986
.