A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age

The lack of exact definition of the concept of biological age (BA) is a typical feature of works concerning BA. That is why comparison of results of various published methods makes little sense and eventual proof of their optimality is impossible. Based on natural and simple presumptions, an attempt to express mathematically the supposed relation between chronological age (CA) and BA has proven to be unexpectedly fruitful. In the present paper, an optimum method of estimation of BA, which is easily applicable even in nonlinear cases, is derived. Moreover, the method allows evaluating the precision of the estimates and also offers tools for validation of presumptions of the method. A special feature of the method is that CA should be used as a standard biomarker, leading to essential improving the precision of BA-estimate and illuminating relativity of the known "paradox of biomarkers". All theoretical results of the method were fully approved by means of a special simulation program. Further, the theory and the results of the simulation have proven that many published results of BA-estimates using multiple linear regression (MLR) are very probably disserviceable because CA is typically more precise estimate of BA than estimates computed by MLR. This unpleasant conclusion also concerns methods, which use MLR as the final step after transformation of the battery of biomarkers by factor analysis or by principal component analysis.

[1]  Ward Dean,et al.  Biological Aging Measurement: Clinical Applications , 1988 .

[2]  Robert A. Weale,et al.  Human biological decline and mortality rates , 1997, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[3]  R. Weale,et al.  Biological age--what is it and can it be measured? , 2003, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[4]  G Steen,et al.  Cognitive function in 70-year-old men and women. A 16-year cohort difference population study , 1998, Aging.

[5]  E. Nakamura,et al.  Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis , 1988, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[6]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Biological Age and 12-Year Cognitive Change in Older Adults: Findings from the Victoria Longitudinal Study , 2004, Gerontology.

[7]  Mark Ya. Azbel Phenomenological theory of mortality and aginge , 1998 .

[8]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Analysis. Third Edition. , 1970 .

[9]  J. Kroll,et al.  On the use of regression analysis for the estimation of human biological age , 2004, Biogerontology.

[10]  David L. Wilson Aging hypothesis, aging markers and the concept of biological age , 1988, Experimental Gerontology.

[11]  D Bellamy Assessing biological age: reality? , 1995, Gerontology.

[12]  Richard Hochschild,et al.  Improving the precision of biological age determinations. Part 2: Automatic human tests, age norms and variability , 1989, Experimental Gerontology.

[13]  D K Ingram,et al.  Toward the behavioral assessment of biological aging in the laboratory mouse: concepts, terminology, and objectives. , 1983, Experimental aging research.

[14]  F. Massey,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Analysis , 1970 .

[15]  Ken Williams,et al.  Genetic determination of biological age in the mennonites of the midwestern United States , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[16]  M. Skalicky,et al.  Models of the biological age of the rat. I. A factor model of age parameters , 1980, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[17]  Richard Hochschild,et al.  Improving the precision of biological age determinations. Part 1: A new approach to calculating biological age , 1989, Experimental Gerontology.

[18]  V P Voitenko,et al.  The assessment of biological age and sex differences of human aging. , 1983, Experimental aging research.

[19]  A. Zaia,et al.  Use of mathematical models of survivorship in the study of biomarkers of aging: the role of heterogeneity , 2001, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[20]  V. I. Dontsov,et al.  Diagnosing Aging: I. Problem of Reliability of Linear Regression Models of Biological Age , 2004, Human Physiology.

[21]  E. Nakamura,et al.  A study on the basic nature of human biological aging processes based upon a hierarchical factor solution of the age-related physiological variables , 1991, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[22]  Donald K. Ingram,et al.  Key questions in developing biomarkers of aging , 1988, Experimental Gerontology.

[23]  René Guéguen Proposition of an Aging Indicator from General Health Examination in France , 2002, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[24]  W. Oswald,et al.  Sind Alter und Altern meßbar? , 2000, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[25]  Arthur K. Balin Practical Handbook of Human Biologic Age Determination , 1994 .

[26]  E. Nakamura,et al.  Biological ages of adult men and women with Down's syndrome and its changes with aging , 1998, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.