Protein abundance is key to distinguish promiscuous from functional phosphorylation based on evolutionary information

In eukaryotic cells, protein phosphorylation is an important and widespread mechanism used to regulate protein function. Yet, of the thousands of phosphosites identified to date, only a few hundred at best have a characterized function. It was recently shown that these functional sites are significantly more conserved than phosphosites of unknown function, stressing the importance of considering evolutionary conservation in assessing the global functional landscape of phosphosites. This leads us to review studies that examined the impact of phosphorylation on evolutionary conservation. While all these studies have shown that conservation is greater among phosphorylated sites compared with non-phosphorylated ones, the magnitude of this difference varies greatly. Further, not all studies have considered key factors that may influence the rate of phosphosite evolution. Such key factors are their localization in ordered or disordered regions, their stoichiometry or the abundance of their corresponding protein. Here we take into account all of these factors simultaneously, which reveals remarkable evolutionary patterns. First, while it is well established that protein conservation increases with abundance, we show that phosphosites partly follow an opposite trend. More precisely, Saccharomyces cerevisiae phosphosites present among abundant proteins are 1.5 times more likely to diverge in the closely related species Saccharomyces bayanus when compared with phosphosites present in the 5 per cent least abundant proteins. Second, we show that conservation is coupled to stoichiometry, whereby sites frequently phosphorylated are more conserved than those rarely phosphorylated. Finally, we provide a model of functional and noisy or ‘accidental’ phosphorylation that explains these observations.

[1]  Natalie Wilson,et al.  Human Protein Reference Database , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  C. Landry,et al.  Molecular characterization of the evolution of phagosomes , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Different phosphorylation states of the anaphase promoting complex in response to antimitotic drugs: A quantitative proteomic analysis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[5]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli,et al.  Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Interconnected System-Wide Responses to Perturbations of Kinases and Phosphatases in Yeast , 2010, Science Signaling.

[6]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Constraints imposed by non-functional protein–protein interactions on gene expression and proteome size , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  Marcus B Smolka,et al.  Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[9]  David J. Chen,et al.  ATM-Dependent and -Independent Dynamics of the Nuclear Phosphoproteome After DNA Damage , 2010, Science Signaling.

[10]  Luca Freschi,et al.  Phosphorylation network rewiring by gene duplication , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[11]  Yoshio Tateno,et al.  Evolution of protein phosphorylation for distinct functional modules in vertebrate genomes. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  C. S. Tan,et al.  Sequence, Structure, and Network Evolution of Protein Phosphorylation , 2011, Science Signaling.

[13]  Cathryn M. Gould,et al.  Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites—update 2011 , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  M. Mann,et al.  Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  Dan S. Tawfik Messy biology and the origins of evolutionary innovations. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[16]  C. Wilke,et al.  A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  C. von Mering,et al.  PaxDb, a Database of Protein Abundance Averages Across All Three Domains of Life , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[18]  G. Lienhard,et al.  Non-functional phosphorylations? , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[19]  C. Pál,et al.  Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.

[20]  Jos Boekhorst,et al.  Evaluating Experimental Bias and Completeness in Comparative Phosphoproteomics Analysis , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  T. Pawson,et al.  Cell Signaling in Space and Time: Where Proteins Come Together and When They’re Apart , 2009, Science.

[22]  Paul H. Huang,et al.  Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies insulin enhancement of discoidin domain receptor 2 phosphorylation , 2012, Cell adhesion & migration.

[23]  Emmanuel D Levy,et al.  Signaling Through Cooperation , 2010, Science.

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Applied to the Yeast Pheromone Signaling Pathway*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[25]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Genome-wide evolutionary conservation of N-glycosylation sites. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  T. Mustelin Protein tyrosine phosphatases in human disease. , 2006, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[27]  S. Gygi,et al.  Global Analysis of Cdk1 Substrate Phosphorylation Sites Provides Insights into Evolution , 2009, Science.

[28]  Joanna M. Sasin,et al.  Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in the Human Genome , 2004, Cell.

[29]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Regulatory evolution in proteins by turnover and lineage-specific changes of cyclin-dependent kinase consensus sites , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[31]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Eduardo P C Rocha,et al.  The quest for the universals of protein evolution. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[33]  Scott A Gerber,et al.  Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of alpha-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[34]  S. Elledge,et al.  A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Bernard F. Buxton,et al.  The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder , 2004, Bioinform..

[36]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Tight Regulation of Unstructured Proteins: From Transcript Synthesis to Protein Degradation , 2008, Science.

[37]  Gabriele Maria Weintz Phosphoproteome Analysis of the Macrophage Response to Toll-like Receptor (TLR)-Activation , 2010 .

[38]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Topology of protein interaction network shapes protein abundances and strengths of their functional and nonspecific interactions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Tuning Bulk Electrostatics to Regulate Protein Function , 2007, Cell.

[41]  M. Lynch The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  M. Mann,et al.  Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks , 2006, Cell.

[43]  T. Hunter,et al.  The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[44]  Vanessa E. Gray,et al.  Rampant purifying selection conserves positions with posttranslational modifications in human proteins. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[45]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Phosphoproteomic Analysis Identifies Grb10 as an mTORC1 Substrate That Negatively Regulates Insulin Signaling , 2011 .

[46]  M. Mann,et al.  PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites , 2007, Genome Biology.

[47]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[48]  Samuel H. Payne,et al.  A Multidimensional Chromatography Technology for In-depth Phosphoproteome Analysis*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[49]  C. Landry,et al.  Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[50]  Emmanuel D. Levy,et al.  How Perfect Can Protein Interactomes Be? , 2009, Science Signaling.

[51]  Sandhya Rani,et al.  Human Protein Reference Database—2009 update , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[52]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Moving from transcriptional to phospho-evolution: generalizing regulatory evolution? , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[53]  Blagoy Blagoev,et al.  Mechanism of Divergent Growth Factor Effects in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation , 2005, Science.

[54]  Mike Tyers,et al.  A Mechanism for Cell-Cycle Regulation of MAP Kinase Signaling in a Yeast Differentiation Pathway , 2007, Cell.

[55]  J. Janin,et al.  Quantifying biological specificity: the statistical mechanics of molecular recognition. , 1996, Proteins.

[56]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Evolution of characterized phosphorylation sites in budding yeast. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[57]  Rainer Malik,et al.  Comparative conservation analysis of the human mitotic phosphoproteome , 2008, Bioinform..

[58]  Feng-Chi Chen,et al.  Phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated serine and threonine residues evolve at different rates in mammals. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[59]  B. Futcher,et al.  A Sampling of the Yeast Proteome , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[60]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[61]  M. Lynch The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  A. Stensballe,et al.  Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane and a New Phosphorylation Site Databasew⃞ , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[63]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[64]  Arend Sidow,et al.  A Cell Cycle Phosphoproteome of the Yeast Centrosome , 2011, Science.

[65]  Jos Boekhorst,et al.  Comparative phosphoproteomics reveals evolutionary and functional conservation of phosphorylation across eukaryotes , 2008, Genome Biology.

[66]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Comparative Analysis Reveals Conserved Protein Phosphorylation Networks Implicated in Multiple Diseases , 2009, Science Signaling.

[67]  Yu Xue,et al.  Computational analysis of phosphoproteomics: progresses and perspectives. , 2011, Current protein & peptide science.

[68]  N. Friedman,et al.  Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi , 2007, Nature.

[69]  Zhaohui S. Qin,et al.  A Global Protein Kinase and Phosphatase Interaction Network in Yeast , 2010, Science.

[70]  G. Terstappen,et al.  Phosphoproteome Analysis , 2005, Bioscience reports.

[71]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  A large-scale method to measure absolute protein phosphorylation stoichiometries , 2011, Nature Methods.

[72]  Jürgen Cox,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) and Proteome Quantitation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells to a Depth of 5,111 Proteins*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[73]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Profiling Phosphoproteins of Yeast Mitochondria Reveals a Role of Phosphorylation in Assembly of the ATP Synthase*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[74]  Lewis Y. Geer,et al.  Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.