Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III.

[1]  Kinney Mr.  Quality of life research: rigor or rigor mortis. , 1995, Cardio-vascular nursing.

[2]  R A Deyo,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Spertus,et al.  Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  T M Gill,et al.  A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. , 1994, JAMA.

[5]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[6]  M. Powers,et al.  Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index. , 1992, Research in nursing & health.

[7]  C. Bulpitt,et al.  Assessment of quality of life in cardiovascular therapy. , 1986, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  M. Powers,et al.  Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties , 1985, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[9]  L. Campeau.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. , 1976, Circulation.

[10]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[11]  J. Ware,et al.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[12]  E. Cook,et al.  Pitfalls in the serial assessment of cardiac functional status. How a reduction in "ordinary" activity may reduce the apparent degree of cardiac compromise and give a misleading impression of improvement. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.