Evaluating modular node architectures with limited shelf interconnection [Invited]

In order to simplify and speed up optical network dimensioning, the client-to-line ports interconnection restrictions imposed by the node architecture deployed are typically disregarded. However, as some node architectures can impose restrictions in the client-to-line ports interconnection, some grooming optimizations may be precluded. This is particularly relevant in multi-period scenarios where client traffic is churned between periods. In this case, depending on the node architecture deployed, hitless client traffic churn can be impossible to perform and manual intervention is required. In this work, we present an integer linear programming-based framework that minimizes the number of modules required considering the client-to-line interconnection restrictions. Moreover, the model also computes the client traffic churn blocking probability. The four node architectures considered are nonblocking electrical cross connect (EXC), standalone EXCs, EXCs with extendable backplanes, and EXCs with interconnection via high bit rate client ports. Using the proposed models, we evaluate the impact of node architecture flexibility on the probability of blocking traffic. The results show that EXCs with interconnection via high bit rate client ports tend to reduce the percentage of blocked traffic compared to the remaining modular architectures when the number of required shelves is higher than 2.

[1]  Dominic A. Schupke,et al.  Multiperiod planning for optical networks , 2010, 2010 14th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (NETWORKS).

[2]  Joao Pedro,et al.  On the efficiency of grooming and switching policies for multi-layer network planning with sliceable bandwidth-variable transponders , 2016, 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[3]  Takuya Ohara,et al.  The operator's view of OTN evolution , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  K. Guan,et al.  Multi-Period Planning of WDM Transport Networks Incorporating Demand Uncertainties , 2006, 23rd Biennial Symposium on Communications, 2006.

[5]  Joao Pedro,et al.  Optimized client and line hardware for multiperiod traffic in optical networks with sliceable bandwidth-variable transponders [Invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[6]  Lena Wosinska,et al.  Combining multi-period and multi-layer network planning: Ignored potential? , 2010, 36th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[7]  Georgios Ellinas,et al.  Path Routing in Mesh Optical Networks , 2007 .

[8]  F. Rambach,et al.  A multilayer cost model for metro/core networks , 2013, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[9]  Joao Pedro,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of fixed and flexible node architectures in multiperiod scenarios [Invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[10]  Serge Melle,et al.  Total cost of ownership of WDM and switching architectures for next-generation 100Gb/s networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  R. M. Morais,et al.  Impact of node architecture in the power consumption and footprint requirements of optical transport networks , 2013, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[12]  Elias Drakopoulos,et al.  Planning techniques for Multi-Period Optical Network Designs , 2000 .

[13]  D.A. Schupke,et al.  Multi-period Planning of WDM-Networks: Comparison of Incremental and EoL Approaches , 2006, 2006 2nd IEEE/IFIP International Conference in Central Asia on Internet.

[14]  Paolo Giaccone,et al.  Architecture on demand design for high-capacity optical SDM/TDM/FDM switching , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[15]  Joao Pedro,et al.  Benefits of Node Architecture Flexibility and Hitless Re-Grooming in Transport Networks , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  Gangxiang Shen,et al.  Optimal node hardware module planning for layer-one Optical Transport Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[17]  R. Sabella,et al.  Definition and performance evaluation of a low-cost/high-capacity scalable integrated OTN/WDM switch , 2012, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[18]  Theofanis Orphanoudakis,et al.  Next generation optical nodes: The vision of the European research project IDEALIST , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Joao Pedro,et al.  Modular transport node architectures exploiting limited shelf interconnection and hitless traffic re-grooming , 2016, 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[20]  Theofanis Orphanoudakis,et al.  Switchless elastic rate node (SERANO) architecture: A universal node for optical grooming and adaptive networking , 2016, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.