Vehicular opportunistic communication under the microscope

We consider the problem of providing vehicular Internet access using roadside 802.11 access points. We build on previous work in this area [18, 8, 5, 11] with an extensive experimental analysis of protocol operation at a level of detail not previously explored. We report on data gathered with four capture devices from nearly 50 experimental runs conducted with vehicles on a rural highway. Our three primary contributions are: (1) We experimentally demonstrate that, on average, current protocols only achieve 50% of the overall throughput possible in this scenario. In particular, even with a streamlined connection setup procedure that does not use DHCP, high losses early in a vehicular connection are responsible for the loss of nearly 25% of overall throughput, 15% of the time. (2) We quantify the effects of ten problems caused by the mechanics of existing protocols that are responsible for this throughput loss; and (3) We recommend best practices for using vehicular opportunistic connections. Moreover, we show that overall throughput could be significantly improved if environmental information was made available to the 802.11 MAC and to TCP. The central messagein this paper is that wireless conditions in the vicinity of a roadside access point are predictable, and by exploiting this information, vehicular opportunistic access can be greatly improved.

[1]  Raghupathy Sivakumar,et al.  Application-Aware Acceleration for Wireless Data Networks: Design Elements and Prototype Implementation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[2]  Raghupathy Sivakumar,et al.  A Receiver-Centric Transport Protocol for Mobile Hosts with Heterogeneous Wireless Interfaces , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[3]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measurement-based characterization of 802.11 in a hotspot setting , 2005, E-WIND '05.

[4]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  Low-cost communication for rural internet kiosks using mechanical backhaul , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[5]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Explicit Loss Notification and Wireless Web Performance , 2006 .

[6]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  MV-MAX: improving wireless infrastructure access for multi-vehicular communication , 2006, CHANTS '06.

[7]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  A measurement study of vehicular internet access using in situ Wi-Fi networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[8]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Drive-thru Internet: IEEE 802.11b for "automobile" users , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[9]  Christophe Diot,et al.  Measurements of In-Motion 802.11 Networking , 2006, Seventh IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications (WMCSA'06 Supplement).

[10]  Raghupathy Sivakumar,et al.  A 3: application-aware acceleration for wireless data networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[11]  M. Koch,et al.  Towards automated authentication for mobile users in WLAN hot-spots , 2005, VTC-2005-Fall. 2005 IEEE 62nd Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005..

[12]  John C. Bicket,et al.  Bit-rate selection in wireless networks , 2005 .

[13]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  Robust rate adaptation for 802.11 wireless networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[14]  Thierry Turletti,et al.  IEEE 802.11 rate adaptation: a practical approach , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[15]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  I-TCP: indirect TCP for mobile hosts , 1995, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[16]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  WTCP: A Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Wide-Area Networks , 1999, Wirel. Networks.

[17]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  An Architecture for Tetherless Communication , 2005, Disruption Tolerant Networking.

[18]  Pan Hui,et al.  Haggle: A networking architecture designed around mobile users , 2006 .