"Rational" and Ecocultural Circumstances of Program Take-Up among Low-Income Working Parents

New Hope (NH) is a random-assignment, antipoverty program in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that offers child care subsidies, wage subsidies, health insurance, and, if needed, a temporary community service job to participants working 30 or more hours per week. Despite the relative generosity of the program and supportive caseworkers, take-up was far from universal, and participants rarely used all services. Ethnographic analysis of a random sample of experimental participants found that NH's economically based offer was theoretically too narrow to motivate all participants. Four categories of personal and family circumstances were associated with take-up: 1) the constrained-by-information group (participants' understandings about the program differed from what NH in fact offered); 2) the disruptive-life group (significant personal troubles and instability); 3) the pro-con group (used often explicit cost-benefit calculations); and 4) the daily-routine group (used particular benefits but only if they helped sustain ...

[1]  K. Allison,et al.  Social context and adolescence: Perspectives on development among inner-city African-American teens. , 1995 .

[2]  David R. Riemer.  The Prisoners of Welfare: Liberating America's Poor from Unemployment and Low Wages , 1988 .

[3]  J. Handler,et al.  The Moral Construction of Poverty: Welfare Reform in America , 1991 .

[4]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[5]  J. Layzer,et al.  Improving the Life Chances of Children in Poverty: Assumptions and What We Have Learned , 1998 .

[6]  J. Schneider.  Pathways to Opportunity: The Role of Race, Social Networks, Institutions, and Neighborhood in Career and Educational Paths for People on Welfare , 2000 .

[7]  Michael Hechter,et al.  The Debate on Historical Sociology: Rational Choice Theory and Its Critics1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  J. Handler.  The poverty of welfare reform , 1995 .

[9]  J. Quadagno,et al.  The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty , 1994 .

[10]  C. Mattingly,et al.  Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing , 2001 .

[11]  T. Skocpol.  Protecting Soldiers And Mothers , 1992 .

[12]  N. Quinn,et al.  A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning , 1998 .

[13]  Stacey J. Oliker.  The Proximate Contexts of Workfare and Work: A Framework for Studying Poor Women's Economic Choices , 1995 .

[14]  R. Blank,et al.  It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty. , 1997 .

[15]  Frank F. Furstenberg,et al.  How Families Manage Risk and Opportunity in Dangerous Neighborhoods , 1993 .

[16]  Bradd Shore,et al.  Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning , 1996 .

[17]  Katherine S. Newman,et al.  No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City , 1999 .

[18]  D. Schacter.  The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[19]  N. Denzin.  Reading Rational Choice Theory , 1990 .

[20]  Michael B. Katz,et al.  The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare , 1990 .

[21]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  J. Wiley,et al.  Substance abuse and the course of welfare dependency. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[23]  L. Gordon.  Pitied but Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare 1890-1935 , 1994 .

[24]  R. Boudon.  Limitations of Rational Choice Theory1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.