Coordinated and Cohesive Movement of Two Small Conspecific Fish Induced by Eliciting a Simultaneous Optomotor Response

Background In animal groups such as herds, schools, and flocks, a certain distance is maintained between adjacent individuals, allowing them to move as a cohesive unit. Proximate causations of the cohesive and coordinated movement under dynamic conditions, however, have been poorly understood. Methodology/Principal Findings We established a novel and simple behavioral assay using pairs of small fish (medaka and dwarf pufferfish) by eliciting a simultaneous optomotor response (OMR). We demonstrated that two homospecific fish began to move cohesively and maintained a distance of 2 to 4 cm between them when an OMR was elicited simultaneously in the fish. The coordinated and cohesive movement was not exhibited under a static condition. During the cohesive movement, the relative position of the two fish was not stable. Furthermore, adult medaka exhibited the cohesive movement but larvae did not, despite the fact that an OMR could be elicited in larvae, indicating that this ability to coordinate movement develops during maturation. The cohesive movement was detected in homospecific pairs irrespective of body-color, sex, or albino mutation, but was not detected between heterospecific pairs, suggesting that coordinated movement is based on a conspecific interaction. Conclusions/Significance Our findings demonstrate that coordinated behavior between a pair of animals was elicited by a simultaneous OMR in two small fish. This is the first report to demonstrate induction of a schooling-like movement in a pair of fish by an OMR and to investigate the effect of age, sex, body color, and species on coordination between animals under a dynamic condition.

[1]  K. Tsukamoto,et al.  The ontogeny of schooling behaviour in the striped jack , 1998 .

[2]  Y. Sakaki,et al.  Generation of medaka gene knockout models by target-selected mutagenesis , 2006, Genome Biology.

[3]  I. Aoki Experimental and theoretical studies on schooling in fish. II. Internal dynamics of fish schools in relation to inter-fish distance. , 1984 .

[4]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of fish schools , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  Tetsu Nemoto,et al.  A computer image processing system for quantification of zebrafish behavior , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Jens Krause,et al.  Shoal Choice in the Banded Killifish (Fundulus diaphanus, Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae): Effects of Predation Risk, Fish Size, Species Composition and Size of Shoals , 2010 .

[7]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[8]  Kazuaki Hiramatsu,et al.  Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on the schooling behavior of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[9]  A. Magurran The development of shoaling behaviour in the European minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus , 1986 .

[10]  Yoshio Nakamura,et al.  Some Experiments on the Shoaling Reaction in Oryzias latipes (T EMMINCK et S CHLEGEL ) , 1952 .

[11]  M. Ryan,et al.  Learned Social Preference in Zebrafish , 2004, Current Biology.

[12]  P. Chabanet,et al.  Schooling properties of an obligate and a facultative fish species , 2007 .

[13]  H. Takeuchi,et al.  Proliferation zones in adult medaka (Oryzias latipes) brain , 2010, Brain Research.

[14]  J. Krause,et al.  The social organization of fish shoals: a test of the predictive power of laboratory experiments for the field , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  S. G. Reebs,et al.  INFLUENCE OF BODY SIZE ON LEADERSHIP IN SHOALS OF GOLDEN SHINERS, NOTEMIGONUS CRYSOLEUCAS , 2001 .

[16]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[17]  Anne C. Crook Quantitative evidence for assortative schooling in a coral reef fish , 1999 .

[18]  A. Sinclair,et al.  The African Buffalo: A Study of Resource Limitation of Populations , 1978 .

[19]  J. Wittbrodt,et al.  Medaka and zebrafish, an evolutionary twin study , 2004, Mechanisms of Development.

[20]  E. Shaw,et al.  Development of the optomotor response in the schooling fish, Menidia menidia. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  Kenjiro Watanabe,et al.  Infrared laser–mediated gene induction in targeted single cells in vivo , 2009, Nature Methods.

[22]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The effect of population size and number of influential neighbors on the emergent properties of fish schools , 2005 .

[23]  J. T. Emlen Flocking Behavior in Birds , 1952 .

[24]  T. Todo,et al.  Infrared laser‐mediated local gene induction in medaka, zebrafish and Arabidopsis thaliana , 2009, Development, growth & differentiation.

[25]  A. Ōkubo Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds. , 1986, Advances in biophysics.

[26]  G. Ruxton,et al.  The importance of stable schooling: do familiar sticklebacks stick together? , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Noam Miller,et al.  Quantification of shoaling behaviour in zebrafish (Danio rerio) , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  E. Shaw,et al.  The optomotor reaction of schooling carangid fishes. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[29]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Social Feedback and the Emergence of Leaders and Followers , 2009, Current Biology.

[30]  T. J. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of schools in the minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus (L.) , 1973 .

[31]  D. Tillitt,et al.  Ontogenetic improvement of visual function in the medaka Oryzias latipes based on an optomotor testing system for larval and adult fish , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Pharmacological effects on mirror approaching behavior and neurochemical aspects of the telencephalon in the fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[33]  D. Saito,et al.  Generation of transgenic medaka using modified bacterial artificial chromosome , 2008, Development, growth & differentiation.

[34]  Kazuaki Hiramatsu,et al.  Mathematical modeling of fish schooling of Japanese Medaka using basic behavioral patterns , 2000 .

[35]  Julia K. Parrish,et al.  Factors influencing the structure and maintenance of fish schools , 2007 .