A Testability Measure for DC-Excited Periodically Switched Networks With Applications to DC-DC Converters

Testability analysis is a fundamental prerequisite to any fault location or parameter identification technique (FLPIT) for analog circuits. However, differently from the linear time-invariant field, this topic has been poorly investigated with regard to nonlinear circuits. In this paper, for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, the question is addressed with reference to periodically switched networks with dc stimuli (PSNDSs), a class of inherently nonlinear time-varying circuits that subsumes dc-dc converters as noteworthy members. A rigorous testability measure at both a circuit and a component level is thereby obtained, which provides information as to how many and which components can be unambiguously diagnosed or estimated from time-domain measurements. Consequently, it yields an upper bound, independent of the parameter values and the test instants, to the performance of whatever method actually employed as an FLPIT. This theoretical testability metric has been converted into an efficient computer program for the fully automated testability analysis of PSNDSs presented herein. Such a computer program represents the first practical testability gauge for PSNDSs: it can be employed by both test engineers and circuit designers as a guide to properly selecting injection and measurement points as well as estimating the number of necessary measurement instants, so as to shape their own FLPITs. Several examples are provided for which an in-depth pencil-and-paper testability analysis is contrasted with its automated counterpart provided by the aforementioned software: in particular, popular dc-dc converter topologies are thoroughly analyzed. Comparisons with a previously proposed frequency-domain testability measure are also considered.

[1]  Fang Chen,et al.  Circle Equation-Based Fault Modeling Method for Linear Analog Circuits , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Marcantonio Catelani,et al.  Analog network testability measurement: a symbolic formulation approach , 1991 .

[3]  Li Zhihua.  A Novel Fault Diagnostic Method Based on Node-Voltage Vector Ambiguity Sets , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  Zbigniew Czaja.  Using a Square-Wave Signal for Fault Diagnosis of Analog Parts of Mixed-Signal Electronic Embedded Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  G. Stenbakken,et al.  Ambiguity groups and testability , 1989 .

[6]  Stefano Manetti,et al.  A symbolic approach for testability evaluation in fault diagnosis of nonlinear analog circuits , 1998, ISCAS '98. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.98CH36187).

[7]  N. Navid,et al.  A theory and an algorithm for analog circuit fault diagnosis , 1979 .

[8]  S. Manetti,et al.  Multifrequency measurement of testability with application to large linear analog systems , 1986 .

[9]  Gerard N. Stenbakken,et al.  Test-point selection and testability measures via QR factorization of linear models , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Marcantonio Catelani,et al.  A new symbolic approach for testability measurement of analog networks , 1996, Proceedings of 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference on Industrial Applications in Power Systems, Computer Science and Telecommunications (MELECON 96).

[11]  R. Berkowitz.  Conditions for Network-Element-Value Solvability , 1962 .

[12]  Stefano Manetti,et al.  Determination of an optimum set of testable components in the fault diagnosis of analog linear circuits , 1999 .

[13]  Z. Huang,et al.  Node-fault diagnosis and a design of testability , 1981, 1981 20th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[14]  Stefano Manetti,et al.  A singular-value decomposition approach for ambiguity group determination in analog circuits , 2003 .

[15]  Fang Chen,et al.  Fault Modeling on Complex Plane and Tolerance Handling Methods for Analog Circuits , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Stefano Manetti,et al.  A new symbolic method for analog circuit testability evaluation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[17]  Chin-Long Wey,et al.  Diagnosability analysis of analogue circuits , 1998, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[18]  Matthew Worsman,et al.  Non‐linear analog circuit fault diagnosis with large change sensitivity , 2000, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[19]  Michal Tadeusiewicz,et al.  A New Approach to Multiple Soft Fault Diagnosis of Analog BJT and CMOS Circuits , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[20]  C. Lin,et al.  Topological conditions for single-branch-fault , 1983 .

[21]  Zbigniew Czaja.  Self-Testing of Analog Parts Terminated by ADCs Based on Multiple Sampling of Time Responses , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  Giuseppe Fontana,et al.  An unconditionally sound algorithm for testability analysis in linear time-invariant electrical networks , 2016, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[23]  Neeraj Sen,et al.  Fault diagnosis for linear systems via multifrequency measurements , 1979 .

[24]  N. Sen.  A Measure of Testbility and its Applcation to Test Point Selection-Theory , 1977 .

[25]  A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli,et al.  Diagnosability of nonlinear circuits and systems-Part II: Dynamical systems , 1981 .

[26]  W. J. Dejka.  A review of measures of testability for analog systems , 1977 .

[27]  F. Grasso,et al.  A new simulation program for analog circuits using symbolic analysis techniques , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD).

[28]  Stefano Manetti,et al.  A new efficient method for analog circuit testability measurement , 1994, Conference Proceedings. 10th Anniversary. IMTC/94. Advanced Technologies in I & M. 1994 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technolgy Conference (Cat. No.94CH3424-9).

[29]  R. Priester,et al.  New measures of testability and test complexity for linear analog failure analysis , 1981 .

[30]  Stefano Manetti,et al.  Symbolic techniques in neural network based fault diagnosis of analog circuits , 2010, 2010 XIth International Workshop on Symbolic and Numerical Methods, Modeling and Applications to Circuit Design (SM2ACD).

[31]  Piotr Bilski,et al.  Automated Diagnostics of Analog Systems Using Fuzzy Logic Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[32]  M.A. El-Gamal,et al.  Diagnosability of analog circuits-a graph theoretical approach , 1988, 1988., IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[33]  S. Manetti,et al.  Improvements to numerical testability evaluation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[34]  A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli,et al.  Diagnosability of nonlinear circuits and systems-Part I: The dc case , 1981 .

[35]  Augusto Montisci,et al.  Testability evaluation for analog linear circuits via transfer function analysis , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[36]  Jing Yang,et al.  Complex Field Fault Modeling-Based Optimal Frequency Selection in Linear Analog Circuit Fault Diagnosis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[37]  Neeraj Sen.  A measure of testability and its application to test point selection , 1977 .