Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization

This article explains how embodied cognition and perceptual symbol systems enable product designers to influence consumers by communicating key perceptual features through subtle changes in product design elements. In this way, managers can change perceptual design elements to support line extension strategies. More specifically, design changes can be used as a tool to help evolve consumer perceptions of a product's uses and brand category membership. The role of perceptual symbols in product design is illustrated by a well-known off-road motorbike brand that planned to extend into the street motorbike segment. In order to facilitate consumer acceptance of a street motorbike from this off-road brand, the firm gradually introduced models containing an increasing number of elements of street motorbikes over a period of several years. The authors use this example to show how typical design elements of the target product category can be effectively integrated with design elements of the current product category by simply modifying key characteristics of product-shape attributes. This process is further tested in an experiment, where motorbike models differing slightly in key product features (e.g., product shape) were rated on their resemblance to street or off-road motorbikes. The results show a strong effect of these design changes on brand-category membership. Managerial implications of this approach and future research directions are discussed.

[1]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[2]  P. Herr,et al.  An Investigation of the Processes by Which Product Design and Brand Strength Interact to Determine Initial Affect and Quality Judgments , 2002 .

[3]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[4]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .

[5]  L. Barsalou Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists , 1992 .

[6]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[7]  Erin Anderson,et al.  Inducing Multiline Salespeople to Adopt House Brands , 1995 .

[8]  Dale Littler,et al.  Repertory Grid Technique: an interpretive research framework , 2000 .

[9]  Mark L. Johnson The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason , 1989 .

[10]  Jose A Rosa,et al.  E-(Embodied) Knowledge and E-Commerce: How Physiological Factors Affect Online Sales of Experiential Products , 2003 .

[11]  R. Wallace The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason , 1988 .

[12]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth , 1994 .

[13]  W. Mcguire Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice , 1976 .

[14]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[15]  Keith S. Jones,et al.  What Is an Affordance? , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[16]  J. Bettman An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[17]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[18]  Deborah J. MacInnis,et al.  Product Category Perceptions, Elaborative Processing and Brand Name Extension Strategies , 1990 .

[19]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Inferential Belief Formation in the Cue Utilization Process , 1978 .

[20]  Marvin Berkowitz,et al.  Product shape as a design innovation strategy , 1987 .

[21]  A. Clark,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. , 1988 .

[22]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Embodied meaning and negative priming , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  G. Fricchione Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[24]  E. Murray THEORY OF PERSONALITY , 1953 .

[25]  L. Barsalou Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields , 1992 .

[26]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind , 1992 .

[27]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design , 1999 .

[28]  David M. Boush Brand Name Effects on Interproduct Similarity Judgments , 1997 .

[29]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[31]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Substitution in Use and the Role of Usage Context in Product Category Structures , 1991 .

[32]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework , 1987 .

[33]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[34]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[35]  James R. Bettman,et al.  Issues in Designing Consumer Information Environments , 1975 .

[36]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[37]  Robert Lawson,et al.  The role of price knowledge in consumer product knowledge structures , 2002 .

[38]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[39]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  A. Malter An Introduction to Embodied Cognition: Implications For Consumer Research , 1996 .

[41]  G. Zaltman Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In , 1997 .

[42]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  R. Lawson Consumer Knowledge Structures: Networks and Frames , 1998 .

[44]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[45]  Merle Crawford,et al.  Design that sells and sells and , 1992 .

[46]  Tom Peters,et al.  Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image , 1997 .

[47]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[48]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Towards A Foundation for Cognitive Science, by Zenon W. Pylyshyn, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., xxiii + 292 pp., £26.15 , 1985, Robotica.

[49]  M. Sujan,et al.  Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising , 1987 .

[50]  Robert W. Veryzer Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences , 1993 .

[51]  H. Barlow Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology by Stephen E. Palmer , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise , 1996 .

[53]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1994 .