Spatiotemporal object continuity in human ventral visual cortex

Coherent visual experience requires that objects be represented as the same persisting individuals over time and motion. Cognitive science research has identified a powerful principle that guides such processing: Objects must trace continuous paths through space and time. Little is known, however, about how neural representations of objects, typically defined by visual features, are influenced by spatiotemporal continuity. Here, we report the consequences of spatiotemporally continuous vs. discontinuous motion on perceptual representations in human ventral visual cortex. In experiments using both dynamic occlusion and apparent motion, face-selective cortical regions exhibited significantly less activation when faces were repeated in continuous vs. discontinuous trajectories, suggesting that discontinuity caused featurally identical objects to be represented as different individuals. These results indicate that spatiotemporal continuity modulates neural representations of object identity, influencing judgments of object persistence even in the most staunchly “featural” areas of ventral visual cortex.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  David A. Boas,et al.  Frontal Lobe Activation during Object Permanence: Data from Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Farah,et al.  Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology , 1996 .

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Oscillatory activity in the infant brain reflects object maintenance. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  E. W. Ames,et al.  A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. , 1988 .

[8]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[9]  R. Henson,et al.  BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[12]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  D. Schacter,et al.  Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning , 2004, Nature.

[15]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex , 1995, Nature.

[16]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Laurie R Santos 'Core knowledges': a dissociation between spatiotemporal knowledge and contact-mechanics in a non-human primate? , 2004, Developmental science.

[18]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Seeing Two as One: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness , 1997 .

[20]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981, Psychological review.

[21]  D. Navon,et al.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  R. Weale Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[23]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[24]  M. Chun,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Learning-Related Repetition Attenuation Effects in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where , 1992 .

[26]  J. Guérit,et al.  Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology, T.E. Feinberg, M.J. Farah. McGraw Hill, Berlin (1997), 872 , 1999 .

[27]  Brian J Scholl,et al.  Dynamic Object Individuation in Rhesus Macaques , 2004, Psychological science.

[28]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[29]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual organization in moving patterns , 1983, Nature.

[31]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[32]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[33]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Neuronal representation of occluded objects in the human brain , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Neural Substrates of Dynamic Object Occlusion , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  D. Perrett,et al.  Neuronal representation of disappearing and hidden objects in temporal cortex of the macaque , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  E. Spelke,et al.  Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy , 1995 .

[38]  F. Miezin,et al.  Functional anatomical studies of explicit and implicit memory retrieval tasks , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  Susan Carey,et al.  Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[40]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  S Zeki,et al.  The sightless view: neural correlates of occluded objects. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces , 2006, Brain Research.

[43]  M. Chun,et al.  Linking Implicit and Explicit Memory: Common Encoding Factors and Shared Representations , 2006, Neuron.

[44]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  E. Rolls,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex in short term and serial recognition memory tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.