’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs CCD QE in the Soft X-ray Range Other

e2v has previously provided back-illuminated CCDs for several solar observation projects, resulting in a number of key articles on CCD QE in the soft X-ray region. To update these, e2v has arranged for tests on X-ray optimised EMCCDs at a synchrotron. These have shown QE of at least 45% from 40 eV to 2000 eV, with Enhanced process devices having significantly higher QE than Basic process. The measured values were similar to data published from the SDO SXI mission, showing that the e2v process has been stable over many years. The soft X-ray QE measurements show a reasonable fit to the simple layer model for energies > 600 eV. For energies < 100 eV, measurements show slightly lower QE than the model prediction for both Basic and Enhanced processes. For energies 100 eV to 600 eV, measurements show a reasonable fit to the model for the Basic process, but less improvement from the Enhanced process than the model predicts. Comparing the ~80% typical QE for UV-optimised CCDs at 385 nm with the 45% QE measured at 120 eV in this study, there is a discrepancy in QE for two photon energies with the same absorption length measured on CCDs from the same back-thinning process (one type with AR coating, one type without).

[1]  J. Gow,et al.  Quantum efficiency measurements in the swept charge device CCD236 , 2014 .

[2]  M. R. Soman,et al.  Developing a CCD camera with high spatial resolution for RIXS in the soft X-ray range , 2013 .

[3]  Hazem Yousef,et al.  Energy dependent charge spread function in a dedicated synchrotron beam pnCCD detector , 2011 .

[4]  Jay A. Bookbinder,et al.  The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) for the Solar Dynamics Observatory , 2006 .

[5]  Silvano Fineschi,et al.  Telescopes and Instrumentation for Solar Astrophysics , 2004 .

[6]  Alan A. Wells,et al.  The X-ray energy response of silicon Part A. Theory , 1994 .

[7]  M. Blouke,et al.  Quantum efficiency measurements and modeling of ion-implanted, laser-annealed charge-coupled devices: x-ray, extreme-ultraviolet, ultraviolet, and optical data. , 1994, Applied optics.

[8]  H. Fitting,et al.  Transmission, energy distribution, and SE excitation of fast electrons in thin solid films , 1974 .

[9]  T. E. Everhart,et al.  Determination of Kilovolt Electron Energy Dissipation vs Penetration Distance in Solid Materials , 1971 .

[10]  K. Perez Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , 2014 .

[11]  P. Bogdanovich,et al.  Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , 2013 .

[12]  Regina Soufli,et al.  Initial Calibration of the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) , 2012 .

[13]  D. Lynch,et al.  Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids , 1985 .

[14]  T. G. Berlincourt,et al.  Physics research , 1983, Nature.

[15]  T. J. Tanaka,et al.  Low-energy x-ray interaction coefficients: Photoabsorption, scattering, and reflection: E = 100–2000 eV Z = 1–94☆ , 1982 .

[16]  D. Spicer,et al.  Solar Physics , 1881, Nature.