Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance

The widespread uptake of platform strategies turns many vendors of enterprise software into curators of an ecosystem of firms that collaboratively develop and commercialize a shared technology. As a platform owner's effectiveness in integrating knowledge across ecosystem participants will distinguish it from its competitors, we investigate the management of development‐related knowledge across firm boundaries. Our exploratory, multiple‐case study of 4 platforms illustrates how “knowledge boundaries” emerge between platform owners and complementors. We observe that knowledge boundaries are influenced by a platform's functional extent, interface design, and evolutionary dynamics, which create differences, dependencies, and novelty of development knowledge, resulting in qualitatively distinct types of knowledge boundaries. To overcome knowledge boundaries, platform owners provide various resources at the boundary, including information portals, documentation, helpdesks, and alignment workshops. We observe that in shaping these resources, platform owners face a trade‐off between providing knowledge at the right scope, while allowing for the scalability of knowledge resources for the entire ecosystem. Depending on their scope and scale, we classify knowledge boundary resources as broadcasting, brokering, and bridging, each representing qualitatively distinct patterns in managing knowledge in platform ecosystems. We conclude with implications for researchers and managers.

[1]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Josep Lluís Cano Giner,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[4]  Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  Persistent problems and practices in information systems development: a study of mobile applications development and distribution , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .

[6]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[7]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[8]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[10]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Software Development Practices, Software Complexity, and Software Maintenance Performance: a Field Study , 1998 .

[12]  M. Engle Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[13]  Peng Huang,et al.  Appropriability Mechanisms and the Platform Partnership Decision: Evidence from Enterprise Software , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[15]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[16]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy--and How to Make Them Work for You , 2016 .

[17]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[18]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[20]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[21]  Christoph Rosenkranz,et al.  Boundary Interactions and Motors of Change in Requirements Elicitation: A Dynamic Perspective on Knowledge Sharing , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[23]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[27]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Making Design Rules: A Multi-Domain Perspective , 2005 .

[28]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[30]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[33]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[34]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[35]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[36]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[37]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[38]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[39]  J. Ross,et al.  Beyond the Business Case: New Approaches to IT Investment , 2002 .

[40]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[41]  Armin Heinzl,et al.  Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance , 2017, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[43]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Technology and Product/Service Innovation: A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future Research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[45]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and technological change , 2014 .

[46]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Exploring Value Cocreation in Relationships Between an ERP Vendor and its Partners: A Revelatory Case Study , 2012, MIS Q..

[49]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[50]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[51]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[52]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[53]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[54]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[55]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[56]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[57]  James Roche,et al.  Adopting DevOps practices in quality assurance , 2013, CACM.

[58]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[59]  Christian Hestermann Magic Quadrant for Single-Instance ERP for Product-Centric Midmarket Companies 09 , 2016 .

[60]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[61]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[62]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[63]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[64]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[65]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[66]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[67]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[68]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[69]  Edward G. Anderson,et al.  Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[71]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[73]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[74]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..