Predicting Discourse Connectives for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition

Existing works indicate that the absence of explicit discourse connectives makes it difficult to recognize implicit discourse relations. In this paper we attempt to overcome this difficulty for implicit relation recognition by automatically inserting discourse connectives between arguments with the use of a language model. Then we propose two algorithms to leverage the information of these predicted connectives. One is to use these predicted implicit connectives as additional features in a supervised model. The other is to perform implicit relation recognition based only on these predicted connectives. Results on Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 show that predicted discourse connectives help implicit relation recognition and the first algorithm can achieve an absolute average f-score improvement of 3% over a state of the art baseline system.

[1]  Jan Alexandersson,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue , 2009, SIGDIAL 2009.

[2]  Sasha J. Blair-Goldensohn,et al.  Long-answer question answering and rhetorical-semantic relations , 2007 .

[3]  Roxana Gîrju,et al.  Automatic Detection of Causal Relations for Question Answering , 2003, ACL 2003.

[4]  Ani Nenkova,et al.  Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text , 2009, ACL.

[5]  Philip J. Stone,et al.  Extracting Information. (Book Reviews: The General Inquirer. A Computer Approach to Content Analysis) , 1967 .

[6]  Ani Nenkova,et al.  Using Syntax to Disambiguate Explicit Discourse Connectives in Text , 2009, ACL.

[7]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory , 2001, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[8]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  Recognizing Implicit Discourse Relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank , 2009, EMNLP.

[9]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[10]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations , 2002, ACL.

[11]  Satoshi Sekine,et al.  Using Phrasal Patterns to Identify Discourse Relations , 2006, HLT-NAACL.

[12]  Marshall S. Smith,et al.  The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. , 1967 .

[13]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Inferring Sentence-internal Temporal Relations , 2004, NAACL.

[14]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: an assessment , 2022 .

[15]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources , 2006, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[16]  Martin F. Porter,et al.  An algorithm for suffix stripping , 1997, Program.

[17]  Jason Baldridge,et al.  Probabilistic Head-Driven Parsing for Discourse Structure , 2005, CoNLL.

[18]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. , 2008, LREC.

[19]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  Sentence Level Discourse Parsing using Syntactic and Lexical Information , 2003, NAACL.