Testing social theories in computer-mediated communication through gaming and simulation

Information is a critical component of commercial transactions. Our games, the LEMONADE STAND and HULIA, and simulation, AUCTION SIMULATION, represent a variety of computerized commercial situations where information may be actively shared or traded or passively available as part of the transaction. These games and simulation served as research tools for testing a variety of social theories aiming to offer some explanations for information behavior in online spaces and its subsequent effect on the commercial transactions taking place. We demonstrate, using the analytical sciences approach, how computerized games and simulations are used to study and validate theoretical constructs in networked environments. Validating a variety of theories using three different artifacts, while acknowledging their strengths and limitations, shows promise for the continued development of games and simulations as important instruments for the analytical sciences approach.

[1]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[2]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Subjective Value of Information in Trading , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor , 1993, TOIS.

[4]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible , 2002, CACM.

[5]  C. W. Smith.  Auctions: The Social Construction of Value , 1989 .

[6]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team: an experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  J. Klabbers.  Gaming and Simulation: Principles of a Science of Design , 2003 .

[8]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[9]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[11]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  An analysis of research in computing disciplines , 2004, CACM.

[12]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[13]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[14]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations , 1999 .

[15]  Joseph Wolfe,et al.  On the Use of Computerized Simulations for Entrepreneurship Education , 1994 .

[16]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  Enhancing Policy Development Through Actor-Based Simulation , 2005 .

[18]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing , 2006 .

[19]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[20]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[21]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[22]  Masoud Hemmasi,et al.  Managerial Skills Acquisition: A Case for Using Business Policy Simulations , 1992 .

[23]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[24]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Social Presence: Influence on Bidders in Internet Auctions , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[25]  Jonathon D. Brown,et al.  The Self and Social Conduct: Linking Self-Representations to Prosocial Behavior , 1991 .

[26]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[27]  Robert B. Wilson.  Chapter 8 Strategic analysis of auctions , 1992 .

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  R. Thaler.  The Winner s Curse , 1991 .

[30]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  The Effect of Source Nature and Status on the Subjective Value of Information , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[32]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[33]  J. Kagel,et al.  The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment , 1999 .

[34]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[35]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[36]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Investigating Ownership and the Willingness to Share Information Online , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[38]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[39]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Online Simulations in Management Education about Information and its Uses , 2007 .

[40]  Jan H. G. Klabbers.  The Emerging Field of Simulation & Gaming: Meanings of a Retrospect , 2001 .

[41]  J. Walther.  Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[42]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[43]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[44]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[45]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[46]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[47]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[48]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[49]  S. Hart,et al.  Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications , 1992 .

[50]  J. Kagel,et al.  Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research, 1995 - 2008* , 2008 .

[51]  Micha Popper,et al.  Organizational Learning in a Hospital , 2000 .

[52]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[53]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  MULTI PLAYER, INTERNET AND JAVA-BASED SIMULATION GAMES: LEARNING AND RESEARCH IN IMPLEMENTING A COMPUTERIZED VERSION OF THE "BEER-DISTRIBUTION SUPPLY CHAIN GAME" , 1999 .

[54]  Dwight R. Norris.  External Validity of Business Games , 1986 .

[55]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[56]  James K. Beggan.  On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. , 1992 .

[57]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  RESEARCH THROUGH ONLINE SIMULATION OF TEAM COORDINATION, COMMUNICATION, AND INFORMATION SHARING , 2001 .

[58]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[59]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self‐esteem, self‐presentation, and future Interaction: A dilemma of reputation , 1982 .

[60]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.