A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand

In this paper we analyze demand for cycling using a discrete choice model with latent variables and a discrete heterogeneity distribution for the taste parameters. More specifically, we use a hybrid choice model where latent variables not only enter into utility but also inform assignment to latent classes. Using a discrete choice experiment we analyze the effects of weather (temperature, rain, and snow), cycling time, slope, cycling facilities (bike lanes), and traffic on cycling decisions by members of Cornell University (in an area with cold and snowy winters and hilly topography). We show that cyclists can be separated into two segments based on a latent factor that summarizes cycling skills and experience. Specifically, cyclists with more skills and experience are less affected by adverse weather conditions. By deriving the median of the ratio of the marginal rate of substitution for the two classes, we show that rain deters cyclists with lower skills from bicycling 2.5 times more strongly than those with better cycling skills. The median effects also show that snow is almost 4 times more deterrent to the class of less experienced cyclists. We also model the effect of external restrictions (accidents, crime, mechanical problems) and physical condition as latent factors affecting cycling choices.

[1]  Saudi Arabia,et al.  Introducing Non-Normality of Latent Psychological Constructs in Choice Modeling with an Application to Bicyclist Route Choice , 2015 .

[2]  John Pucher,et al.  Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies , 2006 .

[3]  John Pucher,et al.  Making Walking and Cycling Safer: Lessons from Europe , 2000 .

[4]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Understanding cyclists' perceptions, keys for a successful bicycle promotion , 2014 .

[5]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Travel Choices and Links to Transportation Demand Management , 2012 .

[6]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .

[7]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike , 2009 .

[8]  P M Allaman,et al.  New approaches to understanding travel behavior , 1982 .

[9]  Todd Litman,et al.  Automobile Dependency and Economic Development , 1999 .

[10]  A. Rivlin,et al.  Economic Choices , 2001 .

[11]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Benefits of shift from car to active transport , 2012 .

[12]  Max Bulsara,et al.  Active commuting in a university setting: Assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change , 2006 .

[13]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Analysis of Stated Preferences for Intermodal Bicycle-Transit Interfaces , 1996 .

[14]  M. A. Habib,et al.  MODELING ANTICIPATED INTEGRATION OF BIKESHARE WITH TRAVEL MODES , 2013 .

[15]  Sevgi Erdogan,et al.  Ridesharing as a Green Commute Alternative: A Campus Case Study , 2015 .

[16]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Integrating psychometric indicators in latent class choice models , 2014 .

[17]  Antonio Páez,et al.  Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel , 2013 .

[18]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research , 2004 .

[19]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US , 2009 .

[20]  Mayer Hillman,et al.  CYCLING AND THE PROMOTION OF HEALTH , 1993 .

[21]  Carlos J. L. Balsas,et al.  Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses , 2003 .

[22]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[23]  Ma Xiang-lu,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle:An Overview of the Literature , 2011 .

[24]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .

[25]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  The impact of transportation demand management policies on commuting to college facilities: A case study at the University of Trieste, Italy , 2014 .

[26]  W C Wilkinson,et al.  SELECTING ROADWAY DESIGN TREATMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE BICYCLES , 1994 .

[27]  D. Ragland,et al.  Bicycle commuting market analysis using attitudinal market segmentation approach , 2013 .

[28]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Investigating Subjective and Objective Factors Influencing Teenagers' School Travel Mode Choice: Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model , 2015 .

[29]  Maria Kamargianni,et al.  Hybrid Choice Model to Investigate Effects of Teenagers' Attitudes toward Walking and Cycling on Mode Choice Behavior , 2013 .

[30]  Timothy J. Tardiff,et al.  Causal inferences involving transportation attitudes and behavior , 1977 .

[31]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Bicycling Choice and Gender Case Study: The Ohio State University , 2013 .

[32]  Jon D Fricker,et al.  Network Evaluation Tool to Improve Real and Perceived Bicycle Safety , 2007 .

[33]  John E Abraham,et al.  Influences on bicycle use , 2007 .

[34]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Generalized random utility model , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[35]  Isam Kaysi,et al.  Modeling travel choices of students at a private, urban university: Insights and policy implications , 2014 .

[36]  Markus Herrmann,et al.  Reducing Automobile Dependency on Campus: Evaluating the Impact TDM Using Stated Preferences , 2012 .

[37]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .