Analysis of template update strategies for keystroke dynamics

Keystroke dynamics is a behavioral biometrics showing a degradation of performance when used over time. This is due to the fact that the user improves his/her way of typing while using the system, therefore the test samples may be different from the initial template computed at an earlier stage. One way to bypass this problem is to use template update mechanisms. We propose in this work, new semi-supervised update mechanisms, inspired from known supervised ones. These schemes rely on the choice of two thresholds (an acceptance threshold and an update threshold) which are fixed manually depending on the performance of the system and the level of tolerance in possible inclusion of impostor data in the update template. We also propose a new evaluation scheme for update mechanisms, taking into account performance evolution over several time-sessions. Our results show an improvement of 50% in the supervised scheme and of 45% in the semi-supervised one with a configuration of the parameters chosen so that we do not accept many erroneous data.

[1]  Sungzoon Cho,et al.  Continual Retraining of Keystroke Dynamics Based Authenticator , 2007, ICB.

[2]  Andrey Makrushin,et al.  Automatic Template Update Strategies for Biometrics , 2007 .

[3]  Massimo Tistarelli,et al.  Advances in Biometrics , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Challenges and Research Directions for Adaptive Biometric Recognition Systems , 2009, ICB.

[5]  Christophe Rosenberger,et al.  GREYC keystroke: A benchmark for keystroke dynamics biometric systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems.

[6]  Baptiste Hemery,et al.  Low Cost and Usable Multimodal Biometric System Based on Keystroke Dynamics and 2D Face Recognition , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Lee Luan Ling,et al.  User authentication through typing biometrics features , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Model and Score Adaptation for Biometric Systems: Coping With Device Interoperability and Changing Acquisition Conditions , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Robert Sabourin,et al.  An adaptive classification system for video-based face recognition , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[10]  K. Revett,et al.  Password secured sites - stepping forward with keystroke dynamics , 2005, International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWeSP'05).

[11]  Bernadette Dorizzi,et al.  On assessing the robustness of pen coordinates, pen pressure and pen inclination to time variability with personal entropy , 2009, 2009 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems.

[12]  Roy A. Maxion,et al.  Comparing anomaly-detection algorithms for keystroke dynamics , 2009, 2009 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks.

[13]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  Adaptive Biometric Systems That Can Improve with Use , 2008 .

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Template Adaptation based Fingerprint Verification , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[15]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  Template Update Methods in Adaptive Biometric Systems: A Critical Review , 2009, ICB.

[16]  Venu Govindaraju,et al.  Behavioural biometrics: a survey and classification , 2008, Int. J. Biom..

[17]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Advances in Biometrics, International Conference, ICB 2007, Seoul, Korea, August 27-29, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, ICB.