Do Preference Reversals Disappear When We Allow for Probabilistic Choice?

The “preference reversal phenomenon,” a systematic disparity between people’s valuations and choices, poses challenges for theory and policy. Using a very general formulation of probabilistic preferences, we show that the phenomenon is not mainly due to intransitive choice. We find a high degree of regularity within choice tasks and also within valuation tasks, but the two types of tasks appear to evoke very different cognitive processes, even when the experimental environment tries to minimise differences. We discuss possible implications for modelling and eliciting preferences.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2333 . This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, decision analysis .

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[2]  R. Luce Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches , 2000 .

[3]  Graham Loomes,et al.  Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 2007 .

[4]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice , 2006 .

[5]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[6]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[7]  I. Bateman Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas Laitila,et al.  Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual , 2004 .

[9]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[11]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Nonlinear preference and utility theory , 1988 .

[12]  R. Sugden,et al.  A Rationale for Preference Reversal , 1983 .

[13]  P. Blavatskyy Preference reversals and probabilistic decisions , 2009 .

[14]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[15]  Michel Regenwetter,et al.  Quantitative tests of the Perceived Relative Argument Model: comment on Loomes (2010). , 2014, Psychological review.

[16]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. , 2005, Psychological review.

[17]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances , 2008 .

[18]  J. Jaffray,et al.  Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses , 1987 .

[19]  G. Loomes,et al.  Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes When Preferences are Imprecise , 2014 .

[20]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[21]  Christian Seidl,et al.  Preference Reversal , 2002 .

[22]  H. Lindman Inconsistent preferences among gambles. , 1971 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[24]  G. Loomes Quantitative tests of the Perceived Relative Argument Model: reply to Guo and Regenwetter (2014). , 2014, Psychological review.

[25]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[26]  Barry Sopher,et al.  Intransitive cycles: Rational choice or random error? An answer based on estimation of error rates with experimental data , 1993 .

[27]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[28]  H. Stott Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie , 2006 .

[29]  Paul Slovic,et al.  American Economic Association The Causes of Preference Reversal Author ( s ) , 2007 .

[30]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences , 1990 .

[31]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of , 1992 .

[32]  A. Terracol,et al.  Risk aversion and framing effects , 2012 .

[33]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  An Experimental Measurement of Utility , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[35]  A. Parducci Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[36]  Robert Sugden,et al.  OBSERVING VIOLATIONS OF TRANSITIVITY BY EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1991 .

[37]  G. Loomes,et al.  Testing for independence while allowing for probabilistic choice , 2014 .

[38]  Pavlo R. Blavatskyy,et al.  Models of Stochastic Choice and Decision Theories: Why Both are Important for Analyzing Decisions , 2008 .

[39]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.