Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech and its transfer to an unfamiliar talker.

How fast can listeners adapt to unfamiliar foreign accents? Clarke and Garrett [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3647-3658 (2004)] (CG04) reported that native-English listeners adapted to foreign-accented English within a minute, demonstrating improved processing of spoken words. In two web-based experiments that closely follow the design of CG04, the effects of rapid accent adaptation are examined and its generalization is explored across talkers. Experiment 1 replicated the core finding of CG04 that initial perceptual difficulty with foreign-accented speech can be attenuated rapidly by a brief period of exposure to an accented talker. Importantly, listeners showed both faster (replicating CG04) and more accurate (extending CG04) comprehension of this talker. Experiment 2 revealed evidence that such adaptation transferred to a different talker of a same accent. These results highlight the rapidity of short-term accent adaptation and raise new questions about the underlying mechanism. It is suggested that the web-based paradigm provides a useful tool for investigations in speech adaptation.

[1]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Sleep facilitates generalisation of accent adaptation to a new talker , 2018, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[2]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Learning a Talker or Learning an Accent: Acoustic Similarity Constrains Generalization of Foreign Accent Adaptation to New Talkers. , 2017, Journal of memory and language.

[3]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Speech Perception and Generalization Across Talkers and Accents , 2016 .

[4]  Christina Y. Tzeng,et al.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Michael C. Hout,et al.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Dave F. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. , 2015, Psychological review.

[7]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  1 Divide and conquer : how perceptual contrast sensitivity and perceptual learning cooperate in reducing input variation in speech perception , 2015 .

[8]  Eva Reinisch,et al.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories? , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[9]  L. Holt,et al.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  R. Knight,et al.  Cross-Accent Intelligibility of Speech in Noise: Long-Term Familiarity and Short-Term Familiarization , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Sleep restores loss of generalized but not rote learning of synthetic speech , 2013, Cognition.

[12]  Bodo Winter,et al.  The interaction between competition, learning, and habituation dynamics in speech perception , 2013 .

[13]  H. Beek F1000Prime recommendation of False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. , 2012 .

[14]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The role of memory consolidation in generalisation of new linguistic information , 2012, Cognition.

[15]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[16]  Meghan Sumner The role of variation in the perception of accented speech , 2011, Cognition.

[17]  Kristin J. Van Engen,et al.  The Wildcat Corpus of Native-and Foreign-accented English: Communicative Efficiency across Conversational Dyads with Varying Language Alignment Profiles , 2010 .

[18]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  Does training on a phonemic contrast absent in the listener's dialect influence word recognition? , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. Dahan,et al.  Context-conditioned generalization in adaptation to distorted speech. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S. Scott,et al.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  P. Dixon Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs , 2008 .

[24]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues , 2008, Cognition.

[25]  Paul A. Luce,et al.  Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias? , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  A. Bradlow 10. Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /®/ - /l/ contrast , 2008 .

[27]  Tessa Bent,et al.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory–visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  James M. McQueen,et al.  The effect of an unfamiliar regional accent on spoken-word comprehension , 2007 .

[30]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Effects of Acoustic Variability in the Perceptual Learning of Non-Native-Accented Speech Sounds , 2007, Phonetica.

[31]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. , 2007, Psychological review.

[32]  Kristin J. Van Engen,et al.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. , 2007, Language and speech.

[33]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[36]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .

[37]  A. Samuel,et al.  Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L) , 2006 .

[39]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  P. Luce,et al.  Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Constance M. Clarke,et al.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  A. Lotto,et al.  Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects , 2002, Hearing Research.

[44]  Shawn A. Weil,et al.  Foreign accented speech: Encoding and generalization , 2001 .

[45]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[46]  J. Flege,et al.  Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels , 1997 .

[47]  J. Hansen,et al.  A STUDY OF TEMPORAL FEATURES AND FREQUENCY CHARACTERISTICS IN AMERICAN ENGLISH FOREIGN ACCENT , 1997 .

[48]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  ACCENT, INTELLIGIBILITY, AND COMPREHENSIBILITY , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[50]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Processing Time, Accent, and Comprehensibility in the Perception of Native and Foreign-Accented Speech , 1995, Language and speech.

[51]  G Strube,et al.  The role of language familiarity in voice identification , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[52]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  T. M. Nearey Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  More Than a Boundary Shift: Perceptual Adaptation to Foreign-Accented Speech Reshapes the Internal Structure of Phonetic Categories , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  Ludwig Maximilian Speaker-specific processing and local context information : The case of speaking rate , 2016 .

[57]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[58]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  A continuum of phonetic adaptation: Evaluating an incremental belief-updating model of recalibration and selective adaptation , 2012, CogSci.

[59]  H. Nusbaum Talker Normalization: Phonetic Constancy as a Cognitive Process , 2011 .

[60]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Regional and Foreign Accent Processing in English: Can Listeners Adapt? , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[61]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  R. Diehl,et al.  Speech Perception , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  Constance M. Clarke,et al.  Processing time effects of short-term exposure to foreign-accented English , 2003 .

[65]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  S. Goldinger,et al.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .