Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding?

[1]  S. Lupker,et al.  Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  K. Forster.  Category size effects revisited: Frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization , 2004, Brain and Language.

[3]  Marcus Taft,et al.  The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[4]  Jennifer M. Rodd,et al.  When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  M. Taft.  Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[7]  G. Murphy,et al.  Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemous senses , 2002 .

[8]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: Theturple effect , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  F. Ferraro,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood size, number of word meanings, and number of higher frequency neighbors , 2002, Brain and Language.

[11]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access , 2002 .

[12]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Representation of Polysemous Words , 2001 .

[13]  S. Joordens,et al.  Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[14]  S. Lupker,et al.  Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  G. Stone,et al.  Reading homographs : Orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics , 1999 .

[17]  S. Lupker,et al.  The effects of polysemy for Japanese katakana words , 1998 .

[18]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The Effects of Word Frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji Words in Naming and Lexical Decision: Can the Dual-Route Model Save the Lexical-Selection Account? , 1998 .

[19]  Daniel S. Levine,et al.  Fundamentals of Neural Network Modeling: Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience , 1998 .

[20]  A. Damasio,et al.  A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[22]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST: The Relatedness of a Word's Meanings Affects Lexical Decision Times , 1997 .

[24]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[25]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[26]  Richard D. Hichwa,et al.  A neural basis for lexical retrieval , 1996, Nature.

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  When Two Meanings Are Better Than One: Modeling the Ambiguity Advantage Using a Recurrent Distributed Network , 1994 .

[29]  Derek Besner,et al.  When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. , 1994 .

[30]  A. H. Kawamoto.  Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .

[31]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[32]  M. Garman.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[34]  M. L. Millis,et al.  The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? , 1988 .

[37]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[38]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[39]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  Derek Besner,et al.  Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes. , 1983 .

[42]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[43]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[44]  J. Jastrzembski.  Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[46]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[47]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed , 1975 .

[49]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[50]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[51]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[52]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[53]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Information retrieval from long-term memory: Category size and recognition time , 1968 .

[54]  Ken McRae,et al.  Shared Features Dominate the Number-Of-Features Effect , 2006 .

[55]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Enemies and friends in the neighborhood: orthographic similarity effects in semantic categorization. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Morphological Representation as a Correlation Between form and Meaning , 2003 .

[58]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  Reading complex words : cross-language studies , 2003 .

[59]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  João Branquinho.  The foundations of cognitive science , 2001 .

[61]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[62]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY EFFECTS IN WORD IDENTIFICATION , 1996 .

[63]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Unsettling Questions About Semantic Ambiguity in Connectionist Models: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994) , 1995 .

[64]  Derek Besner,et al.  Wrestling with ambiguity--further reflections: Reply to Masson and Borowsky (1995) and Rueckl (1995). , 1995 .

[65]  Jay G. Rueckl,et al.  Ambiguity and connectionist networks: Still settling into a solution: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994). , 1995 .

[66]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Generalization with Componential Attractors: Word and Nonword Reading in an Attractor Network , 1993 .

[67]  Nigel H. Goddard,et al.  Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1993 .

[68]  David A. Balota,et al.  Comprehension Processes in Reading , 1990 .

[69]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. , 1987 .

[70]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[71]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.