Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Superimposition Techniques on Various Skeletal Structures of the Head Using Surface Models

Objectives To test the applicability, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of various 3D superimposition techniques for radiographic data, transformed to triangulated surface data. Methods Five superimposition techniques (3P: three-point registration; AC: anterior cranial base; AC + F: anterior cranial base + foramen magnum; BZ: both zygomatic arches; 1Z: one zygomatic arch) were tested using eight pairs of pre-existing CT data (pre- and post-treatment). These were obtained from non-growing orthodontic patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion. All datasets were superimposed by three operators independently, who repeated the whole procedure one month later. Accuracy was assessed by the distance (D) between superimposed datasets on three form-stable anatomical areas, located on the anterior cranial base and the foramen magnum. Precision and reproducibility were assessed using the distances between models at four specific landmarks. Non parametric multivariate models and Bland-Altman difference plots were used for analyses. Results There was no difference among operators or between time points on the accuracy of each superimposition technique (p>0.05). The AC + F technique was the most accurate (D<0.17 mm), as expected, followed by AC and BZ superimpositions that presented similar level of accuracy (D<0.5 mm). 3P and 1Z were the least accurate superimpositions (0.790.05), the detected structural changes differed significantly between different techniques (p<0.05). Bland-Altman difference plots showed that BZ superimposition was comparable to AC, though it presented slightly higher random error. Conclusions Superimposition of 3D datasets using surface models created from voxel data can provide accurate, precise, and reproducible results, offering also high efficiency and increased post-processing capabilities. In the present study population, the BZ superimposition was comparable to AC, with the added advantage of being applicable to scans with a smaller field of view.

[1]  Lucia Cevidanes,et al.  Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Katsuaki Mishima,et al.  Using superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images with surface-based registration in growing patients. , 2010, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[3]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Object modeling by registration of multiple range images , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  G. Santler,et al.  Stereolithography versus milled three-dimensional models: comparison of production method, indication, and accuracy. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[5]  M. Koda,et al.  Efficacy and reliability of highly functional open source DICOM software (OsiriX) in spine surgery , 2010, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[6]  Han-Jun Lee,et al.  Accuracy and Reliability of Length Measurements on Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Using Open-Source OsiriX Software , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Matthias Teschner,et al.  Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  T. Southard,et al.  Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Lewis D. Griffin,et al.  Zen and the art of medical image registration: correspondence, homology, and quality , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  G. Swennen,et al.  Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  J Mühling,et al.  Automated Registration of Intraoperative CT Image Data for Navigated Skull Base Surgery , 2008, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[13]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[14]  William R Proffit,et al.  Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  N. B. Haralabakis,et al.  Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected? , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  P W Major,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[17]  A. Demirjian,et al.  The technical reliability of superimposition on cranial base and mandibular structures. , 1986, European journal of orthodontics.

[18]  Emanuele Trucco,et al.  Robust motion and correspondence of noisy 3-D point sets with missing data , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  M. Ivanovic,et al.  Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[20]  J. English,et al.  Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[21]  P. Christou,et al.  Assessment of potential orthodontic mini-implant insertion sites based on anatomical hard tissue parameters: a systematic review. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[22]  R. Fränkel The applicability of the occipital reference base in cephalometrics. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[23]  Lucia Cevidanes,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  W. Wiltshire,et al.  Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  D. Halazonetis Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[27]  D. Halazonetis,et al.  Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults , 2011, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  W R Proffit,et al.  Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement using 3D CBCT scanning. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[29]  James L Ackerman,et al.  Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  William R Proffit,et al.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  K. Hongo,et al.  Correlation between Squamous Suture and Sylvian Fissure: Osirix DICOM Viewer Study , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  William R Proffit,et al.  Working with DICOM craniofacial images. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[33]  D. Hill,et al.  Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[35]  P. Gunz,et al.  Advances in Geometric Morphometrics , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[36]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1996 .

[37]  Christos Katsaros,et al.  Three-dimensional portable document format: a simple way to present 3-dimensional data in an electronic publication. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[38]  O Majdani,et al.  Evaluation of surface and volume rendering in 3D-CT of facial fractures. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[39]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[40]  Stefano Benazzi,et al.  Comparing 3-dimensional virtual methods for reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. , 2011, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[41]  Myung-Jin Kim,et al.  The 3D CT superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessment of oral and maxillofacial surgery treatment results. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[42]  A. Björk,et al.  Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. , 1983, European journal of orthodontics.

[43]  W. Houston,et al.  Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures. , 1985, European journal of orthodontics.

[44]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Accuracy and Reproducibility of Voxel Based Superimposition of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Models on the Anterior Cranial Base and the Zygomatic Arches , 2011, PloS one.

[45]  A. Rosas,et al.  Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[46]  Demetrios J Halazonetis,et al.  From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[47]  D. Bartlett,et al.  In vivo Measurements of Tooth Wear over 12 Months , 2011, Caries Research.

[48]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[49]  Maryse Fortin,et al.  Quantitative Paraspinal Muscle Measurements: Inter-Software Reliability and Agreement Using OsiriX and ImageJ , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[50]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[51]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[52]  A. Björk,et al.  Growth of the Maxilla in Three Dimensions as Revealed Radiographically by the Implant Method , 1977, British journal of orthodontics.

[53]  B. Melsen Palatal growth studied on human autopsy material. A histologic microradiographic study. , 1975, American journal of orthodontics.

[54]  Paul L. Rosin,et al.  Three-dimensional motion analysis - an exploratory study. Part 1: assessment of facial movement. , 2008, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[55]  M. Styner,et al.  Comparison of two methods for quantitative assessment of mandibular asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography image volumes. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[56]  Demetrios J Halazonetis,et al.  Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[57]  R. Jacobs,et al.  A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. , 2010, European journal of radiology.