Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree Species

Background Canopy structure, which can be defined as the sum of the sizes, shapes and relative placements of the tree crowns in a forest stand, is central to all aspects of forest ecology. But there is no accepted method for deriving canopy structure from the sizes, species and biomechanical properties of the individual trees in a stand. Any such method must capture the fact that trees are highly plastic in their growth, forming tessellating crown shapes that fill all or most of the canopy space. Methodology/Principal Findings We introduce a new, simple and rapidly-implemented model–the Ideal Tree Distribution, ITD–with tree form (height allometry and crown shape), growth plasticity, and space-filling, at its core. The ITD predicts the canopy status (in or out of canopy), crown depth, and total and exposed crown area of the trees in a stand, given their species, sizes and potential crown shapes. We use maximum likelihood methods, in conjunction with data from over 100,000 trees taken from forests across the coterminous US, to estimate ITD model parameters for 250 North American tree species. With only two free parameters per species–one aggregate parameter to describe crown shape, and one parameter to set the so-called depth bias–the model captures between-species patterns in average canopy status, crown radius, and crown depth, and within-species means of these metrics vs stem diameter. The model also predicts much of the variation in these metrics for a tree of a given species and size, resulting solely from deterministic responses to variation in stand structure. Conclusions/Significance This new model, with parameters for US tree species, opens up new possibilities for understanding and modeling forest dynamics at local and regional scales, and may provide a new way to interpret remote sensing data of forest canopies, including LIDAR and aerial photography.

[1]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[2]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Estimating individual tree leaf area in loblolly pine plantations using LiDAR-derived measurements of height and crown dimensions , 2005 .

[3]  S. Sultan,et al.  Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  H. Shugart A Theory of Forest Dynamics , 1984 .

[5]  R. Pinker,et al.  Turbulence structure of a tropical forest , 1988 .

[6]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[8]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  A Reevaluation of the ‐3/2 Power Rule of Plant Self‐Thinning , 1987 .

[9]  C. Canham,et al.  A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding , 2004 .

[10]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[11]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Architecture of 54 moist-forest tree species: traits, trade-offs, and functional groups. , 2006, Ecology.

[12]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  Crown-Diameter Prediction Models for 87 Species of Stand-Grown Trees in the Eastern United States , 2003 .

[13]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Estimating individual tree heights of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2005, Journal of Forest Research.

[14]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Predicting individual stem volumes of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2005, Journal of Forest Research.

[15]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Tree canopy displacement at forest gap edges , 2002 .

[16]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Recent advances in ecosystem-atmosphere interactions: an ecological perspective , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[18]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Human‐induced changes in US biogenic volatile organic compound emissions: evidence from long‐term forest inventory data , 2004 .

[19]  James S. Clark,et al.  Tree growth prediction using size and exposed crown area , 2005 .

[20]  EFFECTS OF COMPENSATORY GROWTH ON POPULATIONPROCESSES: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1997 .

[21]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  CREATING A VIRTUAL TROPICAL FOREST FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL AERIAL IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE CARBON STOCKS , 2005 .

[22]  J. Caspersen Variation in stand mortality related to successional composition , 2004 .

[23]  K. J. Mitchell,et al.  Dynamics and Simulated Yieldof Douglas-fir , 1975 .

[24]  R. Slye,et al.  LONG-TERM SURVIVORSHIP AND CROWN AREA DYNAMICS OF TROPICAL RAIN FOREST CANOPY TREES , 2000 .

[25]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Tree canopy displacement and neighborhood interactions , 2003 .

[26]  P. Stoll,et al.  Pattern and process: competition causes regular spacing of individuals within plant populations , 2005 .

[27]  Jennifer L. R. Jensen,et al.  Estimation of biophysical characteristics for highly variable mixed-conifer stands using small-footprint lidar , 2006 .

[28]  Effects of compensatory growth on population processes : A simulation study , 1997 .

[29]  R. Nelson Modeling forest canopy heights: The effects of canopy shape , 1997 .

[30]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? , 2004 .

[31]  Christian Messier,et al.  Use of a spatially explicit individual-tree model (SORTIE/BC) to explore the implications of patchiness in structurally complex forests , 2003 .

[32]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[33]  T. Olesen ARCHITECTURE OF A COOL‐TEMPERATE RAIN FOREST CANOPY , 2001 .

[34]  H. S. Horn The adaptive geometry of trees , 1971 .

[35]  W. B. Smith,et al.  Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[36]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Crown Asymmetry, Treefalls, and Repeat Disturbance of Broad‐Leaved Forest Gaps , 1991 .

[37]  D. W. MacFarlane,et al.  Modeling loblolly pine canopy dynamics for a light capture model , 2003 .

[38]  C. Roelandt Coupled simulation of potential natural vegetation, terrestrial carbon balance and physical land-surface properties with the ALBIOC model , 2001 .

[39]  David R. Miller Forest stand dynamics , 1997 .

[40]  J. Hervé,et al.  Modelling crown shape of Piceaabies: spacing effects , 1996 .

[41]  E. W. Jones,et al.  Forest Ecology , 1968, Nature.

[42]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program of the USDA forest service: historical perspective and announcements of statistical documentation , 2005 .

[43]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Surface energy exchanges along a tundra-forest transition and feedbacks to climate , 2005 .

[44]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  Largest-Crown- Width Prediction Models for 53 Species in the Western United States , 2004 .

[45]  E. David Ford,et al.  A Model of Competition Incorporating Plasticity through Modular Foliage and Crown Development , 1993 .

[46]  K. Umeki Modeling the relationship between the asymmetry in crown display and local environment , 1995 .

[47]  P. G. Adlard,et al.  Simulation of the Growth of Even-Aged Stands of White Spruce , 1971 .

[48]  Alexandre Piboule,et al.  Reconstructing crown shape from stem diameter and tree position to supply light models. I. Algorithms and comparison of light simulations , 2005 .

[49]  A. Itaya,et al.  Long‐term canopy dynamics analysed by aerial photographs in a temperate old‐growth evergreen broad‐leaved forest , 2003 .