Lineage mapping the pre-implantation mouse embryo by two-photon microscopy, new insights into the segregation of cell fates.

The first lineage segregation in the pre-implantation mouse embryo gives rise to cells of the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm. Segregation into these two lineages during the 8-cell to 32-cell stages is accompanied by a significant amount of cell displacement, and as such it has been difficult to accurately track cellular behavior using conventional imaging techniques. Consequently, how cellular behaviors correlate with cell fate choices is still not fully understood. To achieve the high spatial and temporal resolution necessary for tracking individual cell lineages, we utilized two-photon light-scanning microscopy (TPLSM) to visualize and follow every cell in the embryo using fluorescent markers. We found that cells undergoing asymmetric cell fate divisions originate from a unique population of cells that have been previously classified as either outer or inner cells. This imaging technique coupled with a tracking algorithm we developed allows us to show that these cells, which we refer to as intermediate cells, share features of inner cells but exhibit different dynamic behaviors and a tendency to expose their cell surface in the mouse embryo between the fourth and fifth cleavages. We provide an accurate description of the correlation between cell division order and cell fate, and demonstrate that cell cleavage angle is a more accurate indicator of cellular polarity than cell fate. Our studies demonstrate the utility of two-photon imaging in answering questions in the pre-implantation field that have previously been difficult or impossible to address. Our studies provide a framework for the future use of specific markers to track cell fate molecularly and with high accuracy.

[1]  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Cleavage pattern and emerging asymmetry of the mouse embryo , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[3]  John White,et al.  Long-term two-photon fluorescence imaging of mammalian embryos without compromising viability , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Janet Rossant,et al.  The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[5]  B. Maro,et al.  Orientation of Mitotic Spindles during the 8- to 16-Cell Stage Transition in Mouse Embryos , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst , 2005, Development.

[7]  Y. Marikawa,et al.  Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo , 2009, Molecular reproduction and development.

[8]  T P Fleming,et al.  A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[9]  B. Maro,et al.  Inactivation of aPKCλ Reveals a Context Dependent Allocation of Cell Lineages in Preimplantation Mouse Embryos , 2009, PloS one.

[10]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 Determines Trophectoderm Differentiation , 2005, Cell.

[11]  M. Zernicka-Goetz The first cell-fate decisions in the mouse embryo: destiny is a matter of both chance and choice. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[12]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Cell and molecular regulation of the mouse blastocyst , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[13]  A. Tarkowski,et al.  Blastomeres of the mouse embryo lose totipotency after the fifth cleavage division: expression of Cdx2 and Oct4 and developmental potential of inner and outer blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell embryos. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[14]  M. Johnson,et al.  The fifth cell cycle of the mouse embryo is longer for smaller cells than for larger cells. , 1983, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[15]  J. McConnell,et al.  Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis. , 2004, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[16]  A. Sharov,et al.  A Role for Borg5 During Trophectoderm Differentiation , 2010, Stem cells.

[17]  Janet Rossant,et al.  FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst , 2010, Development.

[18]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Guoji Guo,et al.  Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and specification of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryo. , 2008, Genes & development.

[20]  V. Centonze,et al.  Multiphoton excitation provides optical sections from deeper within scattering specimens than confocal imaging. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions , 2008, Development.