Neural mass model parameter identification for MEG/EEG

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) have excellent time resolution. However, the poor spatial resolution and small number of sensors do not permit to reconstruct a general spatial activation pattern. Moreover, the low signal to noise ratio (SNR) makes accurate reconstruction of a time course also challenging. We therefore propose to use constrained reconstruction, modeling the relevant part of the brain using a neural mass model: There is a small number of zones that are considered as entities, neurons within a zone are assumed to be activated simultaneously. The location and spatial extend of the zones as well as the interzonal connection pattern can be determined from functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor MRI (DTMRI), and other anatomical and brain mapping observation techniques. The observation model is linear, its deterministic part is known from EEG/MEG forward modeling, the statistics of the stochastic part can be estimated. The dynamics of the neural model is described by a moderate number of parameters that can be estimated from the recorded EEG/MEG data. We explicitly model the long-distance communication delays. Our parameters have physiological meaning and their plausible range is known. Since the problem is highly nonlinear, a quasi-Newton optimization method with random sampling and automatic success evaluation is used. The actual connection topology can be identified from several possibilities. The method was tested on synthetic data as well as on true MEG somatosensory-evoked field (SEF) data.

[1]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping - IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , 2001 .

[3]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Connectivity and dynamics of neural information processing , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[4]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[5]  R M Leahy,et al.  Imaging neural activity using MEG and EEG. , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neural modeling and functional brain imaging: an overview , 2000, Neural Networks.

[7]  Ben H. Jansen,et al.  Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling event-related responses in the brain , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[11]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Pascual-Marqui Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem , 1999 .

[14]  A. Anwander,et al.  Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Broca's Area. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Anthony M. Murro,et al.  Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: A comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods , 1995, Brain Topography.

[16]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R. Leahy,et al.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[20]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..