Management Control-Systems And The Implementation Of Strategies

This paper studies the role of management control systems in ensuring that managers choose actions desired by the owner. Using an abstract model of a multi-divisional firm, I show that, in general, second-best sharing rules alone do not suffice to implement the owner's desired action choices when divisions interact. I then show that certain commonly observed internal accounting procedures can help implement these actions, at no additional cost to the owner (except, possibly, administrative costs). In particular, a positive role is derived for internal reports and, based on those reports, the formulation of target-based bonus schemes and the allocation of noncontrollable costs. Such procedures are useful because they coordinate the actions of division managers by linking their performance evaluation schemes, over and above the links that arise from the production system. With the control system in place, each manager attempts to maximize his utility by submitting appropriate reports, which in turn inform the owner about the actions of other divisions. Prior work in accounting that has attempted to explain observed internal control phenomena includes Baiman and Evans [ 1983], who

[1]  Clyde P. Stickney,et al.  Financial accounting: An introduction to concepts, methods, and uses , 1976 .

[2]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[3]  Anthony A. Atkinson Intra Firm Cost and Resource Allocations Theory and Practice , 1987 .

[4]  Stanley Baiman,et al.  PRE-DECISION INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEMS , 1983 .

[5]  Collusion and Noncontrollable Cost Allocation , 1987 .

[6]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Economically Optimal Performance Evaluation And Control-Systems , 1980 .

[7]  Amin H. Amershi,et al.  Implementable equilibria in accounting contexts: An exploratory study* , 1988 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: a field study , 1989 .

[9]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Asymmetric Information, Incentives and Intrafirm Resource Allocation , 1982 .

[10]  Ian Jewitt,et al.  Justifying the First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems , 1988 .

[11]  R. Anthony,et al.  Management Control Systems , 2020, Management Control Systems and Tools for Internationalization Success.

[12]  R. Antle,et al.  THE AUDITOR AS AN ECONOMIC AGENT , 1982 .

[13]  R. Selten Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games , 1975, Classics in Game Theory.

[14]  William P. Rogerson,et al.  THE FIRST-ORDER APPROACH TO PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEMS , 1985 .

[15]  C. Ma Unique Implementation of Incentive Contracts with Many Agents , 1988 .