The role of syntax in encoding and recall of pictorial narratives: Evidence from specific language impairment

Previous research on typically developing children has shown that their memory for events depends on how they are encoded. As children grow older, they start to mention causal and temporal relationships between events, including psychological causes. Children with specific language impairment (SLI) were studied to disentangle the effects of syntactic skill and non-verbal IQ on event encoding and recall. Children with receptive SLI (SLI-R; N = 34) had a significant discrepancy between non-verbal IQ and scores on a receptive language measure. Those with expressive SLI (SLI-E; N = 29) did not have significant receptive impairment, but had low scores on at least one expressive language test. Controls were 32 typically developing children of similar age and non-verbal IQ. Children were shown two sequences of photographs, and in each case, were asked first to describe the story, and then, without warning, to recall it after a delay of 30-40 minutes. Compared with controls, children with SLI recalled significantly less story material. For the SLI-E group, poor recall was totally accounted for by poor initial encoding of the story content. However, for the SLI-R group, story memory was poor even after adjusting for amount of information in the initial narrative. Description and recall of the story ideas were related to use of complex syntax, and failure to use cognitive state terms predicted poor recall. We conclude that use of complex syntax and causal concepts are more important than non-verbal IQ in determining children's event memory.

[1]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  SLI in Children: Movement, Economy, and Deficits in the Computational-Syntactic System , 1998 .

[2]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Signposts to development: theory of mind in deaf children. , 2002, Child development.

[3]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children , 1997 .

[4]  D. Bishop Comprehension of spoken, written and signed sentences in childhood language disorders. , 1982, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[5]  P. Tallal,et al.  Use of cognitive state predicates by language-impaired children. , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[6]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Children with Specific Language Impairment , 1997 .

[7]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Discovering the cement of the universe: The development of event comprehension from childhood to adulthood. , 1997 .

[8]  D. Bishop,et al.  Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: a comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism. , 2002, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[9]  Dorothy V M Bishop,et al.  Narrative skills of children with communication impairments. , 2003, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[10]  Henry M. Wellman,et al.  Developing understandings of mind , 2000 .

[11]  A. McCabe Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Mercer Mayer,et al.  Frog, Where Are You? , 1969 .

[13]  D. Bishop,et al.  Is specific language impairment a valid diagnostic category? Genetic and psycholinguistic evidence. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Heather K. J. Van Der Lely,et al.  Language and cognitive development in a grammatical sli boy: Modularity and innateness , 1997, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[15]  M. Farmer,et al.  Language and social cognition in children with specific language impairment. , 2000, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[16]  R. Paul,et al.  Communication and socialization skills at ages 2 and 3 in "late-talking" young children. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  Paul Fletcher,et al.  The grammatical analysis of language disability , 1976 .

[18]  C Donlan,et al.  GENETIC BASIS OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A TWIN STUDY , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[19]  R. Quirk A Grammar of contemporary English , 1974 .

[20]  D. Bishop,et al.  Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: literal and inferential meaning. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.