Saccadic Eye Movements and Dual-Task Interference

Four dual-task experiments required a speeded manual choice response to a tone in a close temporal proximity to a saccadic eye movement task. In Experiment 1, subjects made a saccade towards a single transient; in Experiment 2, a red and a green colour patch were presented to left and right, and the saccade was to which ever patch was the pre-specified target colour. There was some slowing of the eye movement, but neither task combination showed typical dual-task interference (the “psychological refractory effect”). However, more interference was observed when the direction of the saccade depended on whether a central colour patch was red or green, or when the saccade was directed towards the numerically higher of two large digits presented to the left and the right. Experiment 5 examined a vocal second task, for comparison. The findings might reflect the fact that eye movements can be directed by two separate brain systems–-the superior colliculus and the frontal eye fields; commands from the latter but not the former may be delayed by simultaneous unrelated sensorimotor tasks.

[1]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[2]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[3]  W. G. Koster,et al.  The psychological refractory period , 1966 .

[4]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  M. C. Smith,et al.  The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period , 1969 .

[6]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Eye movements evoked by stimulation of frontal eye fields. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  P. Schiller,et al.  Single-unit recording and stimulation in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  E. Megaw,et al.  Individual and simultaneous tracking of a step input by the horizontal saccadic eye movement and manual control systems. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[11]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  B L Finlay,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. IV. Corticotectal cells. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Enhancement of visual responses in monkey striate cortex and frontal eye fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. K. Harting.  Descending pathways from the superior colliculus: An autoradiographic analysis in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  P. McLeod.  A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[17]  Peter McLeod,et al.  Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period , 1977 .

[18]  P. Schiller,et al.  Properties and tectal projections of monkey retinal ganglion cells. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Robert Gottsdanker,et al.  21 The Ubiquitous Role of Preparation , 1980 .

[20]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  J. E. Albano,et al.  Visual-motor function of the primate superior colliculus. , 1980, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  J. L. Conway,et al.  Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Techniques in Psychophysiology , 1980 .

[24]  D. Robinson,et al.  Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. J. Weber,et al.  Saccadic eye movements during a concurrent auditory task , 1983 .

[26]  J A Mather,et al.  Parallel ocular and manual tracking responses to a continuously moving visual target. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[27]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Jennifer A. Mather,et al.  Orienting to Targets by Looking and Pointing: Parallels and Interactions in Ocular and Manual Performance , 1985 .

[29]  D L Sparks,et al.  Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. , 1986, Physiological reviews.

[30]  J. A. Kleiss,et al.  Locus and persistence of capacity limitations in visual information processing. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  E. G. Keating,et al.  Saccadic disorders caused by cooling the superior colliculus or the frontal eye field, or from combined lesions of both structures , 1988, Brain Research.

[34]  A. Riehle,et al.  Neuronal activity and information processing in motor control: From stages to continuous flow , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[35]  H. Pashler.  Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[37]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[38]  H. Pashler.  Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Harold Pashler.  Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991 .

[40]  H Pashler,et al.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[42]  H Pashler,et al.  Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms , 1993 .