250ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects

It is well known that viewing graspable tools (but not other objects) activates motor-related brain regions, but the time course of affordance processing has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, EEG was continuously recorded from 128 scalp sites in 15 right-handed university students while they received stimuli in the form of 150 pictures of familiar non-tool objects and 150 pictures of manipulable tools, matched for size, luminance and perceptual familiarity. To select the 300 images for the study, a wider set of preliminary stimuli was screened for motoric content by 20 judges using a 3-point scale (0=absent; 2=strong); pictures that scored below 1.5 or above 0.6 were excluded from the tool and non-tool categories, respectively. Tools and non-tools were presented in random order, interspersed with 25 photos of live plants. Each slide was presented for 1000 ms, with an interval ranging from 1500 to 1900 ms. The task consisted of responding to the photos of plants while ignoring the other stimuli. Both an anterior negativity (210-270 ms) and a centroparietal P300 (550-600 ms) were larger in response to tools than objects, particularly in the left hemisphere. swLORETA inverse solution identified the occipito-temporal cortex (BA19 and BA37) as the most significant source of activity (in the 210-270-ms time window) for both types of visual objects and the left postcentral gyrus (BA3) and the left and right premotor cortex (BA6) as the most significant source of activity for tools only. These data hint at an automatic access to motoric object properties even under conditions in which attention is devoted to other stimulus categories.

[1]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Action Priming on Object Recognition: Evidence for Fast and Slow Influences of Action on Perception , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Rugg,et al.  Episodic memory retrieval: an (event-related) functional neuroimaging perspective , 2002 .

[4]  M. Costantini,et al.  The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Peter A Tass,et al.  swLORETA: a novel approach to robust source localization and synchronization tomography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Adamo,et al.  A picture says more than a thousand words: Behavioural and ERP evidence for attentional enhancements due to action affordances , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural origins of the P300. , 2000, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[12]  Marzia Del Zotto,et al.  The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Sakata,et al.  Parietal control of hand action , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  T. Bussey,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of memory : encoding and retrieval , 2002 .

[15]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Perani,et al.  Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man‐made tools , 1995, Neuroreport.

[17]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Is It a Baby? Perceived Age Affects Brain Processing of Faces Differently in Women and Men , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs , 1988 .

[19]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Spatial Frequency Discrimination in a Selective Attention Task , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  F Pulvermüller,et al.  Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.